TPO-02 - Integrated Writing Task In many organizations, perhaps the best way to approach certain new projects is to assemble a group of people into a team. Having a team of people attack a project offers several advantages.
Recently, there has been a lot of debate on how to approach a project either by group work or individual work. More specifically, in response to the reading passage, the author puts forth the idea that gathering experienced and skilled workers in a team to approach the project is advantageous. In the listening passage, the speaker is quick enough to point out that there is some serious flaw in the writers claim. In fact, the professor believes that the group work may lead to an unexpected clogged situation, and addresses, in detail, the trouble with each point made in the reading text.
First and foremost, the author of the reading passage states that a group of people with diverse knowledge and skills in their perspective area will ensure a creative solution with the least possible time. The professor in the listening, however, stands in firm opposition to this claim and posit that not all the member will not be equally occupied with the project and some of them may get a free ride while the team gets a good solution.
one group of scholars, represented by the writer, think that in group work, the responsibility is equally shared by the respective team members and more risky decisions are taken which may not be taken individually. Of course, though, not all the experts in the same field believe this is accurate. The lecturer explains that the decisions may not be quickly taken as the members will have difficulty in coming to a conclusive decision. He goes on to say that there are only one or two influential persons lead the group without any discussion on a probable solution.
Finally, the author wraps his argument by positing that the group management of a project will have a better scope to shine as the team’s solution or accomplishment maybe far-reaching. Not surprisingly, the lecturer takes issue with this claim by contending that the project may fail as the members may not be cooperative at all and the consequence of failure is shared by all resulting in a hamper in professional growth.
To sum up, both the writer and professor hold conflicting views about team project management. It’s clear that they will have trouble finding common ground on this issue.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Recently, there has been a lot of debate...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...each point made in the reading text. First and foremost, the author of the re...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...while the team gets a good solution. one group of scholars, represe...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 11, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: One
...gets a good solution. one group of scholars, represented by the w...
^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y discussion on a probable solution. Finally, the author wraps his argument b...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 11, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... in a hamper in professional growth. To sum up, both the writer and professor...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, however, if, may, so, while, in fact, of course, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 5.04856512141 218% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 12.0 7.30242825607 164% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 22.412803532 89% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 30.3222958057 175% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 5.01324503311 219% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1854.0 1373.03311258 135% => OK
No of words: 376.0 270.72406181 139% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.93085106383 5.08290768461 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40348946061 4.04702891845 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76535897781 2.5805825403 107% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 145.348785872 132% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.510638297872 0.540411800872 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 559.8 419.366225166 133% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 2.5761589404 233% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 21.2450331126 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 53.6426193641 49.2860985944 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.428571429 110.228320801 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.8571428571 21.698381199 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.28571428571 7.06452816374 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 4.19205298013 143% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.347508871919 0.272083759551 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111007109582 0.0996497079465 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0608554634425 0.0662205650399 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.181611305936 0.162205337803 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.044885378335 0.0443174109184 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.3589403974 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 53.8541721854 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.0289183223 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.61 12.2367328918 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.41 8.42419426049 100% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 63.6247240618 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.7273730684 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.498013245 118% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.