The article states that the best way to approach certain new projects is to have a team group and provides three reasons of support. However, the professor explains that is not effective idea and the professor concludes this result from a project that depends on team group for a period of six months.
First, the reading claims that team group has a wider range of experience, knowledge, and skills than a single individual. But the professor refutes this point by saying that not all the team members contribute to work and maybe there are effective individuals but they are out of recognition by the other members.
Second, the article posits that a group can work more quickly to achieve their goals and can make highly effective solutions to issues. The professor opposes that by explaining that some projects didn't move quickly and dropped before reaching their goals and he argued that maybe there were individual who had an influent idea that didn't convince by the other members and the idea was quickly dropped.
Third, the reading states that team group gives the chance to team members to shine and rewarding. But the professor claimed that highly creative members had been ignored by the other group members and all of those reasons above would lead to project failure
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 196, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...s that by explaining that some projects didnt move quickly and dropped before reachin...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 332, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...ndividual who had an influent idea that didnt convince by the other members and the i...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, may, second, so, third
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 7.30242825607 178% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 22.412803532 85% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 30.3222958057 73% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1067.0 1373.03311258 78% => OK
No of words: 217.0 270.72406181 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.91705069124 5.08290768461 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8380880478 4.04702891845 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.35094414029 2.5805825403 91% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 145.348785872 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.52534562212 0.540411800872 97% => OK
syllable_count: 316.8 419.366225166 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.51434878587 198% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 13.0662251656 61% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 21.2450331126 127% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 48.3935687876 49.2860985944 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.375 110.228320801 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.125 21.698381199 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.375 7.06452816374 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.360652821456 0.272083759551 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.166484154058 0.0996497079465 167% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0442026174389 0.0662205650399 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.220878077821 0.162205337803 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0310924546472 0.0443174109184 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.3589403974 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 53.8541721854 98% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 11.0289183223 114% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 12.2367328918 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.4 8.42419426049 100% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 63.6247240618 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.7273730684 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.498013245 122% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 68.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.