The reading and the lecture both about Rembrandt's painting which is doubted real or not. Whereas the author of the reading states that woman's portrait is not painted by the artist, the lecturer suggests that it is real paintings which is proven by latest studies. The lecturer casts doubts on the main points made in the reading by providing three reasons.
To begin with, according to the reading, Rembrandt who is plays one's card close to one's chest would never made mistake which is arising from caution. To put it more simply, he draw a woman who wears workers cap and extremely expensive fur. However, the lecturer disputes this point. She says that, real painting was changed by somebody who tried to raise its price after hundred years.
Secondly, the reading states that Rembrandt was good at illustrate light and shadow, but this painting has few errors caused by spotlight. Nevertheless, the lecture refutes this argument. She argues that original illumination removed, although real painting had great decision of light and shadow.
Finally, the reading claims that even though Rembrandt used wooden panels, he never utilized panel glue. On the other hand, the lecturer believe that the more wooden panel added to expanding its size because of the cost but real painting expected that made by single piece of wood like Rembrandt was used.
In a nutshell, although the reading and the lecture are both about Rembrandt's some creation need to considered real or not, the three main points made in the reading are effectively challenged by the lecture.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 84, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...mbrandt who is plays ones card close to ones chest would never made mistake which is...
^^^^
Line 2, column 176, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'draws'.
Suggestion: draws
...from caution. To put it more simply, he draw a woman who wears workers cap and extre...
^^^^
Line 2, column 371, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a hundred'.
Suggestion: a hundred
...body who tried to raise its price after hundred years. Secondly, the reading states th...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, however, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, whereas, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 22.412803532 85% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 30.3222958057 99% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1305.0 1373.03311258 95% => OK
No of words: 259.0 270.72406181 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03861003861 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01166760082 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.38559427852 2.5805825403 92% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 145.348785872 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.571428571429 0.540411800872 106% => OK
syllable_count: 381.6 419.366225166 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.3379114132 49.2860985944 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.384615385 110.228320801 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9230769231 21.698381199 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.69230769231 7.06452816374 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.34652571562 0.272083759551 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.126137188977 0.0996497079465 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0772384806166 0.0662205650399 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.199945196975 0.162205337803 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0625623970212 0.0443174109184 141% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.3589403974 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 53.8541721854 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 12.2367328918 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.24 8.42419426049 98% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 63.6247240618 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.7273730684 84% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.