TPO-05 - Integrated Writing Task As early as the twelfth century A.D., the settlements of Chaco Canyon in New Mexico in the American Southwest were notable for their "great houses," massive stone buildings that contain hundreds of rooms and often stand th

The article expresses the ways in which the "great houses" were used by people. The article explains three such instances where the "great houses" were used but, professor denies the article and states that neither of them are convincing and also gives possible explanation for holing his opinion.

First, the article states that Chaco structures were residential and looked like apartments and also had rooms for hundreds. But, professor refutes this. He refutes this by claiming that if there is space for hundreds, then there should have been many fire places which are used by the people for cooking purposes. He also claims that a recent excavation of one such mansion, revels that there are only ten fire places. This will definitely disprove that these "great houses" were residential.

Second, the article averts that these buildings were used for grain maize storage. Article also states that the excavation has found large containers that intimates that it was used for the grain storage purposes. However, professor confutes by stating that excavation results are unconvincing because, there are no traces of grain spill on the floor or no proper evidence that there grains were stored in those large containers. Though, the large space inside the building can be assumed to be used for grain storage, no evidence states that it was used for the maize storage purposes.

Third, the article states that these buildings were used for ceremonies of native American culture. Whereas, the professor states that it is unconvincing because the excavation results has also reveled that not only pots but also some other things like construction materials, tools and other things are found. The professor says that it is just a trash heap that contains all such things. He casts doubt that it might be possible that the construction people might had used for their meals and might have dumped this regular thrash.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, look, second, so, then, third, whereas

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 10.4613686534 210% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 23.0 12.0772626932 190% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 22.412803532 174% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 15.0 30.3222958057 49% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 9.0 5.01324503311 180% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1642.0 1373.03311258 120% => OK
No of words: 313.0 270.72406181 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.24600638978 5.08290768461 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20616286096 4.04702891845 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53631868106 2.5805825403 98% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 145.348785872 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.492012779553 0.540411800872 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 504.9 419.366225166 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.2097414915 49.2860985944 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.466666667 110.228320801 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8666666667 21.698381199 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.6 7.06452816374 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.29140565336 0.272083759551 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.11007452015 0.0996497079465 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0574121832485 0.0662205650399 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.18391001868 0.162205337803 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0444983880635 0.0443174109184 100% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.3589403974 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 53.8541721854 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.17 12.2367328918 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.86 8.42419426049 93% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 63.6247240618 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.