The reading and the lecture are both about the Hydrogen-based fuel-cell engine, which is a source of energy that can power the cars, using electricity created from hydrogen. The author of the reading believes that this source has a couple of advantages and might replace the internal-combustion engine in the future. The lecture casts doubt on the claims made in the article. He thinks that hydrogen-based fuel is not that efficient and cannot solve environmental problems.
First of all, the author points out that hydrogen-based fuel is practical, as it can be easily produced from renewable sources like natural gas and water, which is a huge advantage among the internal-combustion fuel. This point is challenged by the lecturer. He says that it is actually difficult to produce because the recourses cannot be used in their normal form and need special circumstances.
Secondly, the author contends that it will solve pollution problems. The lecturer rebuts this argument. He states that hydrogen-based fuel producing factories need to burn a lot of oil, that contaminate the environment
Finally, the author says that Hydrogen-based fuel-cell engine is much cheaper. The lecturer, on the other hand, posits that manufacturing this kind of fuel is very expensive, as it requires plutonium, which is a costly metal. He also adds that it is impossible to replace plutonium with other metal, so the fuel price will not reduce.
In conclusion, the lecturer effectively casts doubt on all the claims presented in the reading.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 318, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ternal-combustion engine in the future. The lecture casts doubt on the claims made ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, finally, first, if, second, secondly, so, in conclusion, kind of, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 5.04856512141 178% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 12.0772626932 124% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 22.412803532 116% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 30.3222958057 82% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1293.0 1373.03311258 94% => OK
No of words: 245.0 270.72406181 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.27755102041 5.08290768461 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.95632099841 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.17834719293 2.5805825403 123% => OK
Unique words: 134.0 145.348785872 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.54693877551 0.540411800872 101% => OK
syllable_count: 395.1 419.366225166 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 55.8781429891 49.2860985944 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.4615384615 110.228320801 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8461538462 21.698381199 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.07692307692 7.06452816374 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.418656317869 0.272083759551 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.127319801084 0.0996497079465 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.111332458026 0.0662205650399 168% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.207297036584 0.162205337803 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.122499541378 0.0443174109184 276% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.3589403974 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 53.8541721854 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.34 12.2367328918 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.65 8.42419426049 103% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 63.6247240618 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.7273730684 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.