The article explains why hydrogen-based-fuel-cells are better than the internal combustion engine, used to produce energy in the car. However, the speaker refutes the author's claims.
Firstly, the article says hydrogen-based-fuel-cells rely on hydrogen, which is abundant, unlike the internal combustion engines which rely on petroleum, a finite resource. But the speaker disagrees saying that hydrogen production is difficult and impractical though it is abundant. Fuel-cell engines require hydrogen as an artificial substance in its pure liquified form. This is difficult and in addition, it requires sophisticated laborative cooling technology.
Next, the author claims hydrogen-based-fuel-cells are environment-friendly because water is the only byproduct, which is not harmful unlike the byproduct of the internal combustion engine, carbon dioxide. However, the speaker says hydrogen producing factories are more harmful than the cars that operate on fuel cells because the production of hydrogen needs oil and coal to burn which generates carbon dioxide thus harming the environment.
Finally, the author claims that hydrogen-based-fuel-cells are economic since they are more efficient than the internal combustion engine. The speaker, in contrast, contends the component platinum, used for these fuel cell is expensive and rare. Furthermore, only platinum can be used to initiate a chemical reaction that produces energy.
Because of the above reasons, the speaker refutes the author claims that hydrogen-based fuel cells are economic, environment-friendly and easily available.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 420, Rule ID: NEEDS_FIXED[1]
Message: "requires sophisticated" is only accepted in certain dialects. For something more widely acceptable, try 'sophisticating' or 'to be sophisticated'.
Suggestion: sophisticating; to be sophisticated
... difficult and in addition, it requires sophisticated laborative cooling technology. Next,...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, so, thus, in addition, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.4613686534 134% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 22.412803532 49% => OK
Preposition: 15.0 30.3222958057 49% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 12.0 5.01324503311 239% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1374.0 1373.03311258 100% => OK
No of words: 224.0 270.72406181 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.13392857143 5.08290768461 121% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86867284054 4.04702891845 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.96137884094 2.5805825403 154% => OK
Unique words: 126.0 145.348785872 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.5625 0.540411800872 104% => OK
syllable_count: 425.7 419.366225166 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.55342163355 122% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 51.0258649009 49.2860985944 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.5 110.228320801 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6666666667 21.698381199 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.5 7.06452816374 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.505938312981 0.272083759551 186% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.202619769001 0.0996497079465 203% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.136078440175 0.0662205650399 205% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.306624745481 0.162205337803 189% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0574592952971 0.0443174109184 130% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 13.3589403974 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 27.83 53.8541721854 52% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.9 11.0289183223 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 18.27 12.2367328918 149% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.68 8.42419426049 115% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 63.6247240618 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.