The reading passage states that one of the portraits of a teenage girl may represent herself and provides three arguments including the decision of her extended family, a similarity of the Casandra sketch and the style of the portrait. However, the lecturer cast doubt on each idea of the author.
First and foremost, the article suggests that the extended family of Austin gave permission to use the portrait of the teenage girl as an illustration after decades of her death. On the other hand, the lecturer rejected this point by saying that the permission held 70 years after her death which gives an idea that her family at that time also have no idea about what she looks like.
Secondly, the reading indicates the nose, mouth and the overall shape of the face of the portrait of a teenage girl without any signature and date is very similar to the Casandra sketch that is the look of adult Austin. In contrast, the lecturer argued that Austin has many female cousins in their teenage years in the period of teenage yours of Austin because their family was huge. Also, most experts believe that it is the image of one of the nieces of Austin.
Finally, the passage claims that the style of the portrait look alike the painter Ozais Humphrey who was active during the late 1780s and early 1790s and he was only affordable for wealthy families like Austins'. Nonetheless, the professor made a counterclaim to the idea by explaining that the similar cover of the teenage girl portrait sold by Williams when Austin was around 27 years old. According to her, the other evidence refutes that the portrait of teenage girl is not represented teenage Austin.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, however, look, may, nonetheless, second, secondly, so, in contrast, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 22.412803532 107% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 30.3222958057 139% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1376.0 1373.03311258 100% => OK
No of words: 287.0 270.72406181 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.79442508711 5.08290768461 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.36365890409 2.5805825403 92% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 145.348785872 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.529616724739 0.540411800872 98% => OK
syllable_count: 431.1 419.366225166 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 21.2450331126 132% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 57.4377053859 49.2860985944 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.6 110.228320801 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.7 21.698381199 132% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.7 7.06452816374 151% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 4.33554083885 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.279507473931 0.272083759551 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.116955826171 0.0996497079465 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0600640586285 0.0662205650399 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.175492293736 0.162205337803 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0442832876124 0.0443174109184 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.3589403974 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.52 53.8541721854 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.0289183223 118% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.09 12.2367328918 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.38 8.42419426049 99% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 63.6247240618 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.7273730684 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.498013245 126% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.