TPO-12 - Integrated Writing Task Jane Austen (1775-1817) is one of the most famous of all English novelists, and today her novels are more popular than ever, with several recently adapted as Hollywood movies. But we do not have many records of what she lo

The reading passage and the lecture discuss the portrait of Jane Austin, a famous English novelist. The author of the passage claims that the girl in the portrait is Jane Austene and gives three supporting reasons. However, the speaker says those details are not convincing to believe and gives more details about the portrait.

Firstly, the reading claims that Austene's family gave permission to use the portrait in her letter editions as an example after her death. This implies that her family accepted the girl in the portrait as Austene. In contrast, the speaker says her family authorized to use the portrait after 70 years of her death. This family had never seen or known about the Austene, asserts the speaker.

Secondly, the reading passage says that the portrait is similar to Cassandra's sketch of adult Austene. The facial features of Cassandra's sketch are similar to the one in the portrait which shows the teenage Austene. However, the professor argues that facts would explain the subject and Cassandra's sketch. The portrait might be Austene's cousins or their children of her extended family who might resemble her.

Thirdly, the reading passage says that the painter, Ozias Hymphrey was active in the period when Austene was a teenager. The author also says he was hired by Austene family as a professional painter and hence the girl in the portrait must be Austene when she was a teenager. On the contrary, the speaker contradicts by saying that the painter might be Ozias due to his style same as the portrait. He says that the stamp on the back side of the portrait shows a black canvas and it was probably sold by William. Records show that the canvas was sold when Austene was 27 years and hence there was no chance of it selling when she was a teenager.

Because of the above reasons, the speaker disagrees to the author's claims that the portrait depicts young Austene.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 275, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'believing'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'convince' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: believing
...r says those details are not convincing to believe and gives more details about the portra...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 240, Rule ID: SAY_TELL[3]
Message: 'Say' cannot be followed by a direct personal object. Did you mean 'tells'?
Suggestion: tells
...it as Austene. In contrast, the speaker says her family authorized to use the portra...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, hence, however, second, secondly, so, third, thirdly, in contrast, on the contrary

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 10.4613686534 153% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 12.0772626932 132% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 22.412803532 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 30.3222958057 109% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 5.01324503311 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1582.0 1373.03311258 115% => OK
No of words: 324.0 270.72406181 120% => OK
Chars per words: 4.88271604938 5.08290768461 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24264068712 4.04702891845 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.35723275435 2.5805825403 91% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 145.348785872 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.444444444444 0.540411800872 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 468.9 419.366225166 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 14.0 8.23620309051 170% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 13.0662251656 130% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 19.8271073748 49.2860985944 40% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 93.0588235294 110.228320801 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0588235294 21.698381199 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.11764705882 7.06452816374 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.27373068433 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.466062264393 0.272083759551 171% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.163246249085 0.0996497079465 164% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.101945214072 0.0662205650399 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.239985660658 0.162205337803 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0930153882737 0.0443174109184 210% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.3589403974 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 53.8541721854 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 11.0289183223 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.02 12.2367328918 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.6 8.42419426049 90% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 63.6247240618 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.

Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.