TPO-12 - Integrated Writing Task
The reading passage and the lecture both about Jane Austin's portrait. The author of the passage believes that the girl in the portrait was Jane Austin when she was young. The lecturer casts serious doubts on the claims made in the article. He says that all evidence in the passage is questionable.
First of all, the author of the passage claims that the girl in the portrait is Jane because her family clearly recognized it as her portrait. This point is challenged by the lecturer. He says that Austin's family gave permission to use the letters of the author in 1882, that is about seventy years after Jane's death. Furthermore, he points out that their family members who gave the permission would never actually seen the author.
Secondly, the reading passage discusses that the face in the portrait clearly resembles Cassandra's sketch of Jane Austin. He says that the details in the portrait are similar to the sketch made by Cassandra. This argument is rebutted by the speaker. She acknowledges that Austin's family is very large and the girl in the portrait could be her distant niece. She elaborates on this by mentioning that the girls in Austin's family have similar face structure as Austin.
Finally, the reading article posits that the painting was made by Humphrey, a society portrait painter was active in the late 1780s, that is the period when Jane was a teenager. The lecturer, on the other hand, mentions that the canvas was sold by William led, who did not sell their canvas at that time when Austin was a teenager. He puts forth to the idea that William sold his canvas when Austin Was 27 years old, clearly older than the girl in the painting.
In summary, while both the reading passage and the classroom discussion present the evidence with regards to the painting, a significant amount of evidence supports the points of the lecturer.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 172, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ait was Jane Austin when she was young. The lecturer casts serious doubts on the cl...
^^^
Line 7, column 463, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ly older than the girl in the painting. In summary, while both the reading passa...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, finally, first, furthermore, if, second, secondly, so, while, in summary, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 10.4613686534 163% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 7.30242825607 41% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 21.0 12.0772626932 174% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 22.412803532 147% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 30.3222958057 125% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1549.0 1373.03311258 113% => OK
No of words: 320.0 270.72406181 118% => OK
Chars per words: 4.840625 5.08290768461 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22948505376 4.04702891845 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.41801304988 2.5805825403 94% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 145.348785872 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.45 0.540411800872 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 460.8 419.366225166 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 3.25607064018 338% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Interrogative: 1.0 0.116997792494 855% => Less interrogative sentences wanted.
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 13.0662251656 130% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.0553679102 49.2860985944 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.1176470588 110.228320801 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8235294118 21.698381199 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.05882352941 7.06452816374 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.283434134821 0.272083759551 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104874829787 0.0996497079465 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0818423955561 0.0662205650399 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.159238453284 0.162205337803 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0694115655593 0.0443174109184 157% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.3589403974 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 53.8541721854 130% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 11.0289183223 72% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.79 12.2367328918 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.44 8.42419426049 88% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 63.6247240618 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.7273730684 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.