According to the reading passage, salvage logging means removing dead tress from forest fire and strong storm areas. That practice beneficial to recovery from a damaged forest and to the economy. Whereas, according to the lecture, salvage logging are short term beneficial but detrimental impact in future. The lecturer contradicts to the each points made in the article.
Firstly, the lecturer refutes the first reason of the reading passage that removing dead trees provides larger and fresh growth of trees. He mentions that clean the dead trees from the forest not necessary that rapid trees growth. In fact, decomposition of trees give enriched soil which is help to natural growth of future generation trees.
Secondly, the lecturer also opposes the second idea made in the article that dead trees allure the insect population which harms to trees growth. The salvage logging helps to remove dead trees and less chance to insect habitat. He explains that increase insect population such as spruce bark beetle live in 100 year without harm to any trees and also dead trees use by bird and other insect as food. It contributes healthy environment and food for insect.
Lastly, the article emphasizes that salvage logging has economic benefit by using damage wood and also provides job for local people. In contrast with this, the lecturer says that salvage logging practice not gain the high profit because of larger weight of wood transportation need the helicopter which is expensive transportation. Besides, job is temporary and suitable for outside people which are trained and have experience than local people.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 297, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
... term beneficial but detrimental impact in future. The lecturer contradicts to the each p...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 217, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'trees'' or 'tree's'?
Suggestion: trees'; tree's
...rom the forest not necessary that rapid trees growth. In fact, decomposition of trees...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 133, Rule ID: TO_NON_BASE[1]
Message: The verb after "to" should be in the base form: 'tree'.
Suggestion: tree
...re the insect population which harms to trees growth. The salvage logging helps to re...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 137, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: contrast,
... also provides job for local people. In contrast with this, the lecturer says that salva...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, firstly, lastly, second, secondly, so, whereas, in contrast, in fact, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 10.4613686534 48% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 7.30242825607 151% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 22.412803532 54% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 30.3222958057 99% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.01324503311 160% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1365.0 1373.03311258 99% => OK
No of words: 261.0 270.72406181 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.22988505747 5.08290768461 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0193898071 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46946086438 2.5805825403 96% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 145.348785872 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.555555555556 0.540411800872 103% => OK
syllable_count: 414.9 419.366225166 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.7643324383 49.2860985944 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.5 110.228320801 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6428571429 21.698381199 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.42857142857 7.06452816374 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.489414821031 0.272083759551 180% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.161580996321 0.0996497079465 162% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0736789520025 0.0662205650399 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.265200544178 0.162205337803 163% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0182677347606 0.0443174109184 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.3589403974 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 53.8541721854 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 12.2367328918 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.34 8.42419426049 99% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 63.6247240618 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.7273730684 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.