The reading passage suggests the benefits of salvage logging which is the practice of removing dead trees from burned areas both to a damaged forest and the economy. However, the professor cast doubt each idea of the author.
First and foremost, the article states that if the dead trees not removed from the forest, it will take years to decompose, so, the salvage logging encourages recovering abruptly. On the other hand, the lecturer rejected this point by saying that if the people remove the trees of damaged areas, it can not create a suitable condition to grow. He also argued that the burned or damaged trees include an oil and nutrient which affect the growth of a latter tree.
Secondly, the passage indicates the damaged trees are convenient for the bad insects to live such as beetle which will harmful for the forest life. In contrast, the professor argued that the beetle lives in Alaska for about a hundred years but there is no damage caused by a beetle and also the burned trees attract the birds and other species that have a positive impact for the forest to grow.
Finally, the reading claims that many industries depend on the forest and if they use the salvage logging, they could save much money. Also, the salvage logging requires more workers than traditional logging, so, it will create additional work positions for natives. Nonetheless, the lecturer made a counterclaim to this idea by explaining the salvage logging require a helicopter or huge cars to transport which is more expensive than the traditional one. According to him, also the working position is temporary and companies prefer experts rather than natives.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, however, if, nonetheless, second, secondly, so, in contrast, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 10.4613686534 48% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 22.412803532 67% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 30.3222958057 76% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1381.0 1373.03311258 101% => OK
No of words: 278.0 270.72406181 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96762589928 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08329915638 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.42396137297 2.5805825403 94% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 145.348785872 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.539568345324 0.540411800872 100% => OK
syllable_count: 429.3 419.366225166 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 21.2450331126 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.9643789756 49.2860985944 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.545454545 110.228320801 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.2727272727 21.698381199 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.3636363636 7.06452816374 147% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.495185430296 0.272083759551 182% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.181807045917 0.0996497079465 182% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.104528797901 0.0662205650399 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.291250700102 0.162205337803 180% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0350674653191 0.0443174109184 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.3589403974 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 53.8541721854 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.0289183223 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 12.2367328918 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.91 8.42419426049 106% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 63.6247240618 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.498013245 114% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.