TPO 16- Integrated: the archaeology science is in danger in Britain because of three reasons
many artifacts were lost in construction projects
many professionals feel that financial support for their research is inadequate
it is difficult to have a career in this field.
The article asserts that nowadays archaeology major feces numerous difficulties in Britain. Nonetheless, the professor not only casts doubt on the presumptions made by the author but also defends her hypothesis by three persuasive rationalizations. She endorses that new guidelines and rules have been adopted which changed this science and improved it in three areas. The explanations of these areas, used to shed light on this controversial issue, are as the following.
First of all, the reading claims that new construction projects have destroyed and sabotaged the situations of many artifacts. However, the lecturer believes that the new guidelines force the construction companies to let the site be examined before any executions. Therefore, if anything valuable and interesting thing is found in the site, they must proceed to the next step which is the decision of local oficials as well as the archaeologists together about whether to preserve the findings or let the construction be done near to their location.
Secondly, the passage upholds that many archaeologists have been suffering from the inadequacy of funds in their major. On the other hand, the aducator overthrows this opinion, mainly because she insists that the new rules force the construction companies, not the government, to pay the archaeologists for any kind of work that must be done on their sites, such as the examinations. Thus, this is considered as a supportive plan for the archaeologists, and they can work on more sites thanks to this new income.
Tertiary, the author acknowledges that there are few job vacancies availabe for archaeologists, but the teacher refutes this idea due to the fact that she insists scores of paid jobs (mostly new) are defined for them throughout all stages of the processes of their major from pre-planning of the site to the processing of the data and writing academic articles. Therefore, today, the number of professional archaeologists is in it climax and they are offered myriad profitable positions.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, nonetheless, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, well, kind of, such as, as well as, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 22.412803532 134% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 30.3222958057 129% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1711.0 1373.03311258 125% => OK
No of words: 323.0 270.72406181 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.29721362229 5.08290768461 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23936324884 4.04702891845 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13876925593 2.5805825403 122% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 145.348785872 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.569659442724 0.540411800872 105% => OK
syllable_count: 524.7 419.366225166 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 21.2450331126 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 81.8041359998 49.2860985944 166% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.583333333 110.228320801 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.9166666667 21.698381199 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.5 7.06452816374 177% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.213835447958 0.272083759551 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0722536350766 0.0996497079465 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.041489657417 0.0662205650399 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119749293774 0.162205337803 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0423940109083 0.0443174109184 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 13.3589403974 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 53.8541721854 84% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 5.55761589404 202% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.0289183223 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.76 12.2367328918 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.33 8.42419426049 111% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 63.6247240618 141% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.7273730684 84% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.498013245 118% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.