The professor and the author mainly talk about three ways to save Torreya tree from extinction. The lecturer states that three ideas made in the reading passage is not tight way to protect this tree so she refutes. The following three points made in the lecture support her opinion.
First ao all, Torreya taxifoha which is a type of tree very common back in the days in Florida usually foster in the place such as dampest and coolest. The professor mentions that reestablish in the same location is not good idea. Because, the North part of Florida where the trees used to grow up become drier and drier cause by global warming. Therefore, there is not suitable environment for trees.
Second, the author claims that moving them to different place is one of the option to conserve however the speaker disagrees with that opinion. Once, human tried to save Black-lotus, people took them to another place but this species killed original plants in the forest. There is a possibility that unpredicted things are happening thus the lecturer denied the idea made by the author.
Lastly, the third option was preserving trees in research center however the professor has shown her opinion for this. The speaker tells that Torreya trees exist with other plants in a large population and diversity community. Hence, if they were not surrounded by currently species, they will get disease and simply it is not capable to survive.
All of considered, the professor refutes the main idea made in the reading passage.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 216, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ay to protect this tree so she refutes. The following three points made in the lect...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, hence, however, if, lastly, second, so, therefore, third, thus, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 22.412803532 76% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 30.3222958057 99% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1264.0 1373.03311258 92% => OK
No of words: 255.0 270.72406181 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.9568627451 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99608801488 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.39782677462 2.5805825403 93% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 145.348785872 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.603921568627 0.540411800872 112% => OK
syllable_count: 384.3 419.366225166 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.6929823385 49.2860985944 54% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 90.2857142857 110.228320801 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2142857143 21.698381199 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.92857142857 7.06452816374 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.224452933014 0.272083759551 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0683251611325 0.0996497079465 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0578612920886 0.0662205650399 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108618478397 0.162205337803 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0758711656545 0.0443174109184 171% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.3589403974 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 53.8541721854 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.0289183223 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 12.2367328918 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.31 8.42419426049 99% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 63.6247240618 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.