The reading and lecture both are about new advertising strategy called buzzing. The lecture proposes benefits of buzzing to the consumers. Whereas, reading passage is against the buzzing.
First of all, according to the lecturer, buzzers are compelled to tell the truth. They get paid because they have used the product and really liked it. They don't have to manipulate just to impress the consumers. On the contrary, the passage states that buzzing may provide some misinformation regarding the buzzed product.
Second, the speaker points out that many people don't believe regarding the advantages of buzzed products. As they know buzzer as a user of product; they tend to ask numerous questions regarding the product. This information couldn't have been available by just viewing the advertisement on television. Thus buzzers help the consumers and clear each and every doubt regarding the product. On the other hand, the writer believes that consumers blindly believe the claims made by buzzers without any doubts as they aren't aware of buzzers. Additionally, they won't crosscheck the information provided by buzzers as they will do in case of advertisements.
Finally, the orator argues that the advertisement companies won't hire buzzers if the product is not upto mark. This will establish trust between buzzers and their friends as they buzz the product they are buzzing really liked and used by them. The reading material refutes to this idea. It states that buzzers are not trustworthy and buzzing may ruin social relationships.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 140, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...s benefits of buzzing to the consumers. Whereas, reading passage is against the buzzing...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 158, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...d the product and really liked it. They dont have to manipulate just to impress the ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 49, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...the speaker points out that many people dont believe regarding the advantages of buz...
^^^^
Line 5, column 225, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: couldn't
...regarding the product. This information couldnt have been available by just viewing the...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 302, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...iewing the advertisement on television. Thus buzzers help the consumers and clear ea...
^^^^
Line 5, column 512, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: aren't
...e by buzzers without any doubts as they arent aware of buzzers. Additionally, they wo...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, if, may, really, regarding, second, so, thus, whereas, first of all, on the contrary, on the other hand, to tell the truth
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 12.0772626932 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 22.412803532 98% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 30.3222958057 99% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1300.0 1373.03311258 95% => OK
No of words: 245.0 270.72406181 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.30612244898 5.08290768461 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.95632099841 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72613952957 2.5805825403 106% => OK
Unique words: 136.0 145.348785872 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.555102040816 0.540411800872 103% => OK
syllable_count: 387.9 419.366225166 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 3.25607064018 215% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 13.0662251656 130% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 21.2450331126 66% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.0864951725 49.2860985944 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 76.4705882353 110.228320801 69% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.4117647059 21.698381199 66% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.11764705882 7.06452816374 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 4.19205298013 143% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.460850377791 0.272083759551 169% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.138340862254 0.0996497079465 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0869158511316 0.0662205650399 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.268485916815 0.162205337803 166% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.108640056447 0.0443174109184 245% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.3589403974 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.27 53.8541721854 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.8 11.0289183223 80% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.93 12.2367328918 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.33 8.42419426049 99% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 63.6247240618 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.0 10.7273730684 47% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.498013245 72% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.