Both reading and lecture discuss a policy, advantages and disadvantages of the policy that it was 'let in burn'. The author claims that three kinds of damage caused by the "let it burn" policy were emphasized by critics of the policy and provides three reasons of support. The professor states that this is an accident in the ecological cycle, and it was creative in the scale of yellow stone, and refutes each reason.
First, the author explains that Yellowstone fires caused huge damage to the park's trees and other vegetation. The speaker contends this idea and states In this area, new plants grow and become diverse. The plant that could not grow and was destroyed by fire is germinated by the new smaller plants and seeds of certain plants at a high level; thus, trees and vegetation would be retrieved.
Second, the article states that the park wildlife was affected as well, and large animals were seen fleeing the fire. The professor opposes this point by saying that the animals were recovered and there is a new opportunity to live them. This happening provides ideal habitat for a certain animal-like rabbit and provides certain foods for these animals. New animals came back due to new habitats and living conditions.
Third, the passage claims that the fires compromised the park's value as a tourist attraction and had negative consequences for the local economy. The lecturer rejects this view and states that if the fire happened every year, this idea could be true, but because of rainfall and strong wind, fires were massive and yellow stone visitors came back each year after this event.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, second, so, third, thus, well
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 7.30242825607 274% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 22.412803532 98% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 30.3222958057 73% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1346.0 1373.03311258 98% => OK
No of words: 272.0 270.72406181 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94852941176 5.08290768461 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06108636974 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.40597403824 2.5805825403 93% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 145.348785872 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.547794117647 0.540411800872 101% => OK
syllable_count: 415.8 419.366225166 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 1.51434878587 264% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.7148165811 49.2860985944 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.166666667 110.228320801 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6666666667 21.698381199 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.75 7.06452816374 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.3589403974 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 53.8541721854 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.73 12.2367328918 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.44 8.42419426049 100% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 63.6247240618 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.