The article states that genetically modified trees, when planted on large mass, can produce numerous benefit and provides three reasons of support. However, the professor claims it can be problematic and expensive and refutes each of the authors justifications.
First, the passage asserts that more resistant than natural trees. The professor confutes this points by saying that it is applicable only under certain condition. She suggests that genetically modified trees are capable of resisting only certain particular kinds of condition, so if some unheralded threatening is exposed to it such as change in temperature or new kinds of bug, then they can be completely wipe out. However, natural trees have diverse gene so some of it's species can survive and continue the spreading of it.
Second, the article posits that genetically modified trees provide economic benefit. however, the professor maintains that it has hidden costs. According to professor, genetically modified plants are expensive than higher plants. Furthermore, the seeds produced by modified plants, after the farmer have grown purchased modified plants, cannot be used by farmer for cultivation in future.
Third, the passage claims that it prevents over exploitation of natural trees. The professor counter this point by explaining that it can cause deleterious effect to natural plants. We came to know that modified trees are grown along with natural trees and they can out compete natural plants for soil, water and nutrients; thus it can have adverse effect on natural plants.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 86, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: However
...odified trees provide economic benefit. however, the professor maintains that it has hi...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 379, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...annot be used by farmer for cultivation in future. Third, the passage claims that it p...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, however, if, second, so, then, third, thus, in particular, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 5.04856512141 158% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 22.412803532 107% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 30.3222958057 86% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1324.0 1373.03311258 96% => OK
No of words: 242.0 270.72406181 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.47107438017 5.08290768461 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94415379849 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70063373682 2.5805825403 105% => OK
Unique words: 139.0 145.348785872 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.574380165289 0.540411800872 106% => OK
syllable_count: 405.9 419.366225166 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.116997792494 855% => Less interrogative sentences wanted.
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 53.4453212813 49.2860985944 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.846153846 110.228320801 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6153846154 21.698381199 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.61538461538 7.06452816374 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 4.45695364238 22% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.354532066154 0.272083759551 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.121985749835 0.0996497079465 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0836259354474 0.0662205650399 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.215820687511 0.162205337803 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0476990542103 0.0443174109184 108% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.3589403974 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 53.8541721854 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.0289183223 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 12.2367328918 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.64 8.42419426049 103% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 63.6247240618 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.7273730684 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.