TPO 22 integrated writing
The reading discusses that ethanol has been endorsed in the USA instead of gasoline. The author listed three reasons why it is not a suitable replacement for gasoline. However, the lecturer finds all the reasons dubious and presents some evidence to refute all these reasons.
First, the reading passage indicates that while it produces carbon dioxide, it could not help to prevent global warming. In contrast, the speaker states that it will not add to global warming, owing to the fact that every green plant absorbs CO2 so the CO2 is produced by it can be removed by plants such as corn. Therefore, the speaker rejects this reason.
Furthermore, the author points out that it would reduce the amount of plant which is available for feeding farm animals or other uses. On the other hand, the lecturer casts doubt on this issue and asserts that it can be produced with cellulose. In other words, it is part of the plant that not be eaten by animals. Hence, this idea is rebutted.
Last but not least, the reading debates that the price of ethanol and gasoline can not compete with each other. Because the price of the ethanol will increase greatly. On the contrary, the speaker dismisses this idea and says that by increasing the production of the ethanol, its cost will decrease since more fuels are available. Thus, the unit of every ethanol dropped to 40%.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 113, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...soline can not compete with each other. Because the price of the ethanol will increase ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, hence, however, so, therefore, thus, while, in contrast, such as, in other words, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 5.04856512141 158% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 22.412803532 103% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 30.3222958057 86% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1131.0 1373.03311258 82% => OK
No of words: 236.0 270.72406181 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.79237288136 5.08290768461 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91947592106 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.3177152714 2.5805825403 90% => OK
Unique words: 136.0 145.348785872 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.576271186441 0.540411800872 107% => OK
syllable_count: 347.4 419.366225166 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 21.2450331126 75% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.1631961415 49.2860985944 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 80.7857142857 110.228320801 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.8571428571 21.698381199 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0714285714 7.06452816374 143% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.27373068433 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.353307463913 0.272083759551 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106634856484 0.0996497079465 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0716583189917 0.0662205650399 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.177759229482 0.162205337803 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.090012651057 0.0443174109184 203% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.6 13.3589403974 72% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 53.8541721854 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.0289183223 76% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.21 12.2367328918 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.31 8.42419426049 99% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 63.6247240618 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.498013245 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.