TPO 26
The lecture and reading are both about threat of the zebra mussels. The reading states that this species might pose harmful effect as it caused difficulty some years ago. The lecturer refuted this by mentioning humans are much more informed than they were. Therefore, human being is able to prevent from this problem thanks to the gathered information.
To begin with, the author posits that zebra mussels can be glued to the ships and take advantage on the particular liquid that vessels utilize to balance freights. Nonetheless, this specific argument is refuted by the lecturer. He states that it will be no longer problem if removing this liquid and refilling with ocean water gets mandatory, and vessels which goes across ocean is capable of meeting this requirement. Thereby, the creature can be detached from the bottom of boats.
Secondly, the lecture contradicts with the idea that this creature may dominate the new habitat since they do not face any harm of natural predators. The lecturer, however, claims that this particular argument is arguably true only in beginning. Over time, birds recognize zebra mussels and relocate to an area where shellfish lives. Therefore, the birds will feed on the shellfish, which proves that the creature can not override other marine faunas for long period of time.
Finally, according to the reading, it is remarked that body of fishes will decrease in quantity in light of the shellfish. On the other hand, the lecturer notes that shellfish serves as prey for some marine creatures. For this reason, shellfish may benefit some species even though it occasion decline of fishes that utilizes plankton as their food.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 172, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...as it caused difficulty some years ago. The lecturer refuted this by mentioning hum...
^^^
Line 3, column 461, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...t override other marine faunas for long period of time. Finally, according to the reading, i...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 286, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'occasions'?
Suggestion: occasions
...may benefit some species even though it occasion decline of fishes that utilizes plankto...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, however, if, may, nonetheless, second, secondly, so, therefore, as for, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 5.04856512141 178% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 22.412803532 120% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 30.3222958057 106% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1395.0 1373.03311258 102% => OK
No of words: 273.0 270.72406181 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10989010989 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06481385082 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44341839291 2.5805825403 95% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 145.348785872 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.59706959707 0.540411800872 110% => OK
syllable_count: 432.9 419.366225166 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.9381464974 49.2860985944 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.0 110.228320801 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2 21.698381199 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.53333333333 7.06452816374 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.221315087299 0.272083759551 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0669398934757 0.0996497079465 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0490695164727 0.0662205650399 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122495256997 0.162205337803 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0311793115285 0.0443174109184 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.3589403974 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 53.8541721854 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 12.2367328918 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.21 8.42419426049 109% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 63.6247240618 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.7273730684 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.