TPO-28 - Integrated Writing Task Robert E. Peary was a well-known adventurer and arctic explorer who in 1909 set out to reach the North Pole. When he returned from the expedition, he claimed to have reached the pole on April 7, 1909. This report made him

Both the reading material and the listening concentrate on whether Peary had reached the North Pole. Though the author offers three strong supports, the speaker disagrees with all these reasons for they are not convincing.

To begin with, the professor has a different view of the committee which the author thinks its declaring proves the truth of reaching North Pole. She points out that this committee is made of Peary’s friends and most of them offered lots of money for his travel. Moreover, this investigation just lasted two days which is too short to get a convincing result. So it cannot approve the truth of Peary’s travel.

Then, according to the passage, Tom Avery’s expedition can provide strong support for Peary’s claim. On the contrary, the speaker aruges it for there are some obvious differences. For example, Avery contains less weight because his food is transported by airplane, not like Peary who has to contain lots of food. What’s more, the weather condition is also different that Avery travelled when weather was suitable.

In the end, the author asserts the photographs can be a powerful evidence. It is true that people use the shadows of photos to detect locations, however, this technology requires the photos should be precise enough. As we all know, the photos taken by ancient cameras are too blurred to calculate the accurate location at Peary’s time. Thus, these photographs are not a confident source to support Peary’s claim.

Votes
Average: 6.8 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, moreover, so, then, thus, as to, for example, it is true, on the contrary, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 7.30242825607 27% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 12.0772626932 58% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 22.412803532 80% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 30.3222958057 82% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1267.0 1373.03311258 92% => OK
No of words: 242.0 270.72406181 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.23553719008 5.08290768461 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94415379849 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76889414938 2.5805825403 107% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 145.348785872 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.632231404959 0.540411800872 117% => OK
syllable_count: 373.5 419.366225166 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 25.9344739445 49.2860985944 53% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 90.5 110.228320801 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.2857142857 21.698381199 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.64285714286 7.06452816374 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 4.33554083885 208% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.325338672452 0.272083759551 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10627408632 0.0996497079465 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0781730232571 0.0662205650399 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.188099982906 0.162205337803 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0286146568033 0.0443174109184 65% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.3589403974 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 53.8541721854 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.0289183223 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 12.2367328918 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.72 8.42419426049 104% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 63.6247240618 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.7273730684 84% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 68.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.