tpo 3

Essay topics:

tpo-3

In the lecture, the speaker states that the painting pointed in the text is real work of Rembrandt although all the arguments in the text are true.
First, inconsistency in the dressing was true but she explaines that fur was added to the original painting 100 years after the time of painting. This will explains the inconsistency in the clothing. She believes that somebody years after the original painting added the fur to increases the value of the painting by looking like aristocracy state.Therefore, the first reason in the text has its explanation.
Moreover, the text claims that Rembrandt was master of light and shade and the painting does not show this skill. The professor points out that the added fur is the reason of this discrepancy and when the fur removed from the painting the light color cloth in the neck does not make any shadow in the face. Consequently, the argument provided is not the reason of painting being fake.
Lastly, in the passage author claimes that the back of painting is not the same of other work of Ramberdt. The lecturer describes that the pannel of wooded glued together added after the fur was added to the original painting. The original painting was in simple wood from same tree that was used in other works of Rambertd. In fact, adding the fur and enlarging the back was performed later to make the painting grand and invaluable by someone else. As a result, the original painting indeed is Ramberdt work.

Votes
Average: 6.8 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 157, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'explain'
Suggestion: explain
...s after the time of painting. This will explains the inconsistency in the clothing. She ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 349, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Therefore
...nting by looking like aristocracy state.Therefore, the first reason in the text has its e...
^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, lastly, look, moreover, so, therefore, in fact, as a result

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.4613686534 134% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 22.412803532 62% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 30.3222958057 122% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1209.0 1373.03311258 88% => OK
No of words: 252.0 270.72406181 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.79761904762 5.08290768461 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98428260373 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55198841548 2.5805825403 99% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 145.348785872 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.468253968254 0.540411800872 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 358.2 419.366225166 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.7720044229 49.2860985944 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.75 110.228320801 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 21.698381199 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.08333333333 7.06452816374 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 4.45695364238 22% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.158630736511 0.272083759551 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0688965917197 0.0996497079465 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0367699085971 0.0662205650399 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104061005758 0.162205337803 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0164789246034 0.0443174109184 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.3589403974 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 53.8541721854 125% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.0289183223 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.56 12.2367328918 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.37 8.42419426049 87% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 63.6247240618 68% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.7273730684 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 68.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.