TPO 33-integrated writing task

Essay topics:

TPO 33-integrated writing task

According to the passage, there are three hyotheses which could explain the usage of the stone balls, founded in Scotland. But, there are several objections that the lecturer stated them.
They might be used to hunt animals by the people.If this was true, the surface of the stone balls would be damaged or the balls would be collapsed to many peices; Because, they were being throwed toward the prey but, the balls' surfaces have remained soft, without any damage sign. So, this viewpoint could not be valid.
It has been mentioned that the balls could be standard criteria for measuring weight, due to their equal size; As it was stated by the lecturer, they have the same size but, they have been made from different stone types which have variety of densities like sand or course aggregates; On the better word, two ball might have the same size but, with different weight. So, the second hypothesis is rejected.
The last one claims that the stone balls were used to social purposes; They were kinds of signs which implied to the social ranks of their owner.This idea, has been inferred from the elaberated designs which are on the balls' surfaces. By the way, people, specialy the reach, had been burried with their posessiones in the grave but, archaeologoists have not found any of the balls in the graves. So, the last ypothesis could not be true.

Votes
Average: 6.8 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 49, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: If
...t be used to hunt animals by the people.If this was true, the surface of the stone...
^^
Line 3, column 310, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'ball' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'balls'.
Suggestion: balls
...rse aggregates; On the better word, two ball might have the same size but, with diff...
^^^^
Line 4, column 145, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: This
...lied to the social ranks of their owner.This idea, has been inferred from the elaber...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, second, so, by the way

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 10.4613686534 191% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 5.04856512141 158% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 12.0772626932 58% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 22.412803532 76% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 30.3222958057 89% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 5.01324503311 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1123.0 1373.03311258 82% => OK
No of words: 235.0 270.72406181 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.77872340426 5.08290768461 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91531732006 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.25943422252 2.5805825403 88% => OK
Unique words: 128.0 145.348785872 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.544680851064 0.540411800872 101% => OK
syllable_count: 332.1 419.366225166 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 3.25607064018 246% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 5.0 8.23620309051 61% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 13.0662251656 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 21.2450331126 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 113.458536506 49.2860985944 230% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 124.777777778 110.228320801 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.1111111111 21.698381199 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.44444444444 7.06452816374 49% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.412720588733 0.272083759551 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.136020249183 0.0996497079465 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.111685702537 0.0662205650399 169% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.241328180983 0.162205337803 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0842233863382 0.0443174109184 190% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.3589403974 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 53.8541721854 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.74 12.2367328918 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.08 8.42419426049 96% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 63.6247240618 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.7273730684 84% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.498013245 118% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 68.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.