tpo 4

Essay topics

The passage claims that there is considerable evidence proving that dinosaurs were endotherms. However, the lecturer holds different views against the passage.

The first evidence cited by the passage is the fact that dinosaur fossils have been discovered in Polar Regions. As only endotherms can maintain a temperature well above the surrounding environment, so it is assumed that dinosaurs were endotherms. However, the lecturer points out that the discovery of the dinosaur fossils does not necessarily mean that dinosaurs were active in the polar area, it could be possible that they hibernate during winter or they migrate to warmer area in the winter. Also, the polar area was not as cold as it is today, it could be warm enough for dinosaurs to live thousands of years ago.

The second evidence mentioned in the passage is the leg position and movement of the dinosaur. Yet it is true that dinosaurs had legs underneath their body, same as the modern endotherms, the lecturer argues that this could be because the dinosaurs were so bit that they needed those legs to support more weight, instead of needing those legs to allow sustained physical activity.

The third evidence used in the passage is the presence of Harversian canals in the dinosaur’s bone. As the bones of endotherms usually contain Harversian, it is assumed that Dinosaurs were endotherm. The lecturer does acknowledge the presence of Harversian canals in the dinosaur’s bone. However, the growth ring in the Dinosaur's bone also indicates periods of both rapid growth and slow growth, which is similar to the non-endotherm animals.

All in all, the lecturer does not agree with the passage with the reasons stated above.

Votes
Average: 0.3 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, second, so, third, well, it is true

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 10.4613686534 182% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 22.412803532 107% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 30.3222958057 102% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.01324503311 180% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1440.0 1373.03311258 105% => OK
No of words: 278.0 270.72406181 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.17985611511 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08329915638 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76270233584 2.5805825403 107% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 145.348785872 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.521582733813 0.540411800872 97% => OK
syllable_count: 450.9 419.366225166 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.5157968203 49.2860985944 127% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.769230769 110.228320801 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3846153846 21.698381199 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.69230769231 7.06452816374 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 4.45695364238 22% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.27373068433 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.3589403974 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 53.8541721854 93% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.0289183223 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 12.2367328918 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.65 8.42419426049 103% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 63.6247240618 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.

Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.