TPO 41

Essay topics:

TPO 41

The critical argument proposed by the reading passage is whether the implement of new, much stricter protocols to power plants is necessary. The author suggests three points of views which are opposed to the principal of new regulation; on the contrary, the professor refutes all of the arguments because she believes that none of the reasons provided in the reading passage is reasonable.
First of all, the reading passage suggests that the regulations of elimination of burning-coal contamination is already existed. For example, according to the representatives of power companies, one regulation have been applied to force the companies install liner, a special material preventing coal ash leakage and contamination to surrounding environment. However, the professor casts doubt on the argument that the existed protocol has only regulated new-setup instruments. A new regulation for old ones is essential to power plants.
Second, the author provides a concerns that consumers may become hesitate to use recycled coal ash products because only dangerous products need to be limited by strict regulations. Nonetheless, the professor contends this misunderstanding by a well-known example. Mercury, a wildly used material but harmful to both human and environment, has been strictly regulated to recycle for more than fifty years while it still a common stuff in people's life. The stricter regulation is not an obstacle for consumer to use recycled materials.
Finally, the reading passage claims that the electric power price as well as the current costs will be dramatically increased if the power companies follow strict new regulations. The professor refutes this point of view by the fact that, according to professional analysts, the electric power price should only raise up nearly one percentage while the current costs totally increased by fifty billion dollars.

Votes
Average: 8 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 277, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
... on the contrary, the professor refutes all of the arguments because she believes that non...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 29, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a concern' or simply 'concerns'?
Suggestion: a concern; concerns
...er plants. Second, the author provides a concerns that consumers may become hesitate to u...
^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, however, if, may, nonetheless, second, so, still, well, while, for example, as well as, first of all, on the contrary

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 7.30242825607 41% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 12.0772626932 58% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 22.412803532 45% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 30.3222958057 106% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 5.01324503311 239% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1592.0 1373.03311258 116% => OK
No of words: 288.0 270.72406181 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.52777777778 5.08290768461 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11953428781 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03108095812 2.5805825403 117% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 145.348785872 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.576388888889 0.540411800872 107% => OK
syllable_count: 498.6 419.366225166 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 14.0 8.23620309051 170% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 21.2450331126 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.6627746004 49.2860985944 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.666666667 110.228320801 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 21.698381199 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.5 7.06452816374 163% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.42163673131 0.272083759551 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.1499600144 0.0996497079465 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0977827148891 0.0662205650399 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.234586304793 0.162205337803 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.124636000701 0.0443174109184 281% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 13.3589403974 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 53.8541721854 72% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.0289183223 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.09 12.2367328918 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.49 8.42419426049 113% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 63.6247240618 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.7273730684 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.498013245 110% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.2008830022 134% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.