TPO 42

Essay topics:

TPO 42

The professor disagrees with all the solutions provided in the text for glass building and birds injery. He belives all the solutions are flawed and will not stop the bird from injeries.
First, the text bring the solution of one way glasses. however, the professor explains that one way glasses work as mirror outside and this would be a significant problem for birds as they do not underestand the mirror and they might fly toward them as they see the three and sky on them. Therefore, this solution won't work.
Also, about the second solution in the reading material, having colorful designs and line, he believes it does not reduce the harm to the bird. He states that by having lines in glass the birds will see the opening and when they see an opening they try to flt through it. This just works if the lines are very close and holes opening are very small which makes the glass and building very dark. So, this solution is not effective.
Lastly, text suggested having magnetic feild in the glass to guide birds away from glass. the lecturer refutes the idea by saying that earth magnetic is a guide for bird in their long distance flight. They do not use it for short distant fly. In fact, eyes and brightness are the main guidance of birds in short distance. Therfore, magnetic feild glasses can not reduce the birds injery as they see by their eyes and brightness in the glass.

Votes
Average: 6.5 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 55, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: However
... bring the solution of one way glasses. however, the professor explains that one way gl...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 90, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...e glass to guide birds away from glass. the lecturer refutes the idea by saying tha...
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, lastly, second, so, therefore, in fact, in short

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 7.30242825607 151% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 12.0772626932 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 22.412803532 107% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 30.3222958057 79% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1142.0 1373.03311258 83% => OK
No of words: 249.0 270.72406181 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.58634538153 5.08290768461 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97237131171 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.16329840805 2.5805825403 84% => OK
Unique words: 129.0 145.348785872 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.518072289157 0.540411800872 96% => OK
syllable_count: 334.8 419.366225166 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.55342163355 84% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 3.25607064018 215% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 8.23620309051 49% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 50.8365227058 49.2860985944 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.5714285714 110.228320801 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7857142857 21.698381199 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.28571428571 7.06452816374 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.335502525501 0.272083759551 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113390202829 0.0996497079465 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0790009168592 0.0662205650399 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.200556703637 0.162205337803 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0397514458723 0.0443174109184 90% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.1 13.3589403974 68% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 79.6 53.8541721854 148% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.4 11.0289183223 58% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 9.05 12.2367328918 74% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.95 8.42419426049 83% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 63.6247240618 61% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 65.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 19.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.