TPO 42 integrated
The reading asserts that glass windows have caused birds to be harmed because they will try to through it and proposes three solutions to prevent this problem. However, the speaker claims that none of these solutions won't effectively stop the birds from flying through the glass windows and refutes each of them.
First, the author argues that regular glass should be replaced by one-way glass that people behind the window can see outside, but birds from the outside cannot see the inside. On the other hand, the lecturer states that one-way glass acts as a mirror, which is as bad as regular glass. This is because one-way glass reflexes the radiation of light so that it may reflect the sky or a tree. Thus, birds that cannot understand the concept of reflection will try to fly through them.
Second, the reading passage says that the glass windows can be designed by thin stripes so that birds avoid them. On the contrary, the professor contends that birds from the outside see the spaces between stripes as holes and will fly through them. Although designers can increase the width of stripes to make spaces between them extremely small, in this case, inside of the building will be too dark.
Third, the author avers that engineers can create an artificial magnetic field to guide the birds away because birds can sense magnetic fields to navigate their path. Conversely, the speaker posits that birds only use magnetic fields for navigation in long distances. For instance, if birds want to migrate from a cold country to a warmer one, they will use magnetic fields for navigation. But for short distances like flying from one side of the street to another side, they will use their eyes.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, conversely, first, however, if, may, second, so, third, thus, for instance, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.4613686534 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 5.04856512141 297% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 22.412803532 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 30.3222958057 132% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1421.0 1373.03311258 103% => OK
No of words: 291.0 270.72406181 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.88316151203 5.08290768461 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.19708327723 2.5805825403 85% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 145.348785872 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.522336769759 0.540411800872 97% => OK
syllable_count: 407.7 419.366225166 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.5216966589 49.2860985944 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 109.307692308 110.228320801 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3846153846 21.698381199 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.84615384615 7.06452816374 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.600286436334 0.272083759551 221% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.217385613926 0.0996497079465 218% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0781891744628 0.0662205650399 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.350605139449 0.162205337803 216% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0513342746734 0.0443174109184 116% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.3589403974 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 53.8541721854 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.32 12.2367328918 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.55 8.42419426049 90% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 63.6247240618 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.7273730684 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.