TPO-43 - Integrated Writing Task

Essay topics:

TPO-43 - Integrated Writing Task

The passage discusses Agnositdes that the y were group of sea animals. These animals extict many years ago. The passage provides three theories abouthow these creatures may have lived. However, the lecture refutes each of outhor's reason and states that non of these theories are reasonable.
First, the text claims that these animals may have been free-swimming predators. However, the professor refutes this theory and says that these creature are blind and they can not freely swim and pray their bates. For accepting this theory there must be evidences in these fossils that these animals belong another kind of ability, but in reality there is no proof for that.
Secon, the text asserts that these beats are seafloor dwelers. However, the passage rejects this theory, too by stating that sea floor dwelers cannot move fast and far. Seafloor dwellers live in a small field of the sea or ocean but the fossils of these creatures find in many places and lead to reject of this theory.
Finally, the reading proposes that these animals are parasites. However, the talk rebuts this idea, too. The professor explains that parasires population are huge. While the population of these animals that manetioned in both reading and lecture are small. So, this idea does not seem possible, too.

Votes
Average: 6.6 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 138, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this creature' or 'these creatures'?
Suggestion: this creature; these creatures
...essor refutes this theory and says that these creature are blind and they can not freely swim ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, however, may, so, well, while, kind of

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 22.412803532 134% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 15.0 30.3222958057 49% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1078.0 1373.03311258 79% => OK
No of words: 213.0 270.72406181 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.06103286385 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82027741392 4.04702891845 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.26088390319 2.5805825403 88% => OK
Unique words: 124.0 145.348785872 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.582159624413 0.540411800872 108% => OK
syllable_count: 333.0 419.366225166 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 21.2450331126 66% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.5280635732 49.2860985944 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 71.8666666667 110.228320801 65% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.2 21.698381199 65% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.93333333333 7.06452816374 56% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 4.33554083885 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.27373068433 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.158694598782 0.272083759551 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0605552361172 0.0996497079465 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0412863998871 0.0662205650399 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101238292787 0.162205337803 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0250599285105 0.0443174109184 57% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.5 13.3589403974 71% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.27 53.8541721854 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.8 11.0289183223 80% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.48 12.2367328918 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.33 8.42419426049 99% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 63.6247240618 85% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.7273730684 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.498013245 72% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.