TPO 44 integrated writing
The reading discusses that the coin was brought from Europe, it was fake. The author listed three factors to support this claim. However, the speaker finds all the reason dubious and presents some evidence to refute all the ideas.
First, the author proposes that great distances between the Maine site and the Native American site refute this idea. In contrast, the peaker states that many other objects found in this place because they travel the great distance to bring their favorite objects that they are interested in. Hence, the speaker dismisses this idea.
Second, the author argues that there were no other coins there so it was implied that no coins brought to this place by Norse. On the other hand, the speaker casts doubt on this issue by standing that it does not necessarily mean that no other coins discovered. Due to the fact that no permanent settlements live there or when Norse took coins back to the first place while he made a voyage trip there.
Last but not least, the author points out that the coin was useless and it has not any utility in American because their money was different. On the contrary, the speaker rejects this reason and declares that it was perhaps valuable for them like a necklace or other types of jewelries for us, therefore they attract to have them and trade these coins with European as they were beautiful and valuable for them.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, hence, however, if, second, so, therefore, while, in contrast, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 5.04856512141 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 22.412803532 156% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 22.0 30.3222958057 73% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1147.0 1373.03311258 84% => OK
No of words: 241.0 270.72406181 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.75933609959 5.08290768461 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94007293032 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.10548921389 2.5805825403 82% => OK
Unique words: 135.0 145.348785872 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.560165975104 0.540411800872 104% => OK
syllable_count: 347.4 419.366225166 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.9064008225 49.2860985944 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.272727273 110.228320801 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9090909091 21.698381199 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.90909090909 7.06452816374 140% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.365035057788 0.272083759551 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.128269738306 0.0996497079465 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0823930562249 0.0662205650399 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.197164573491 0.162205337803 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0578147953287 0.0443174109184 130% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.3589403974 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 53.8541721854 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.0289183223 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.33 12.2367328918 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.43 8.42419426049 88% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 63.6247240618 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.7273730684 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.