TPO-45 - Integrated Writing Task Any student of paleontology will be struck by the fact that a great many animals of the past were considerably larger than they are today. This holds true for species ranging from dinosaurs to most mammals. Just why they w

A very old fossil structures resemble bees nests found inside 200-million-year-old fossilized trees in the United States. The reading passage indicates some evidances that very old fossil structure doesn't belong to Did bees. The lecturer, nonetheless, throws doubt on all evidances presented in the reading passage and offers some counterclaims to refute them all.
First, the author argues that no fossils of bees have been found that date to 200 million years ago. The earliest fossils of bees dates to 100 years ago. Conversely, the lecturer claims that fossils date to 200 years ago may not preserved. Because, special sticky liquid needed to preserve bees fossils which were not existed in 200 year ago.
Furthermore, the reading passage highlights that there is a special relation between flowering plants and bees and no flowering plant existed in that period. The speaker, on the contary, claims it is possible that bees fed on not flowering plants like ferns. The lecturer claims that bees used flowering plant after they have evolved.
Finally, the author brings up the idea that the fossilized nest is not similar to the nests of modern bees. The nests of modern bees are closed by caps that have a spiral pattern. The professor, In contrast, claims that there are some chemical evidances that bees used water proofing material like modern nest in fossilized nest.

Votes
Average: 0.3 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 199, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...vidances that very old fossil structure doesnt belong to Did bees. The lecturer, nonet...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...some counterclaims to refute them all. First, the author argues that no fossils...
^^
Line 2, column 242, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ate to 200 years ago may not preserved. Because, special sticky liquid needed to preser...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hich were not existed in 200 year ago. Furthermore, the reading passage highlig...
^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...owering plant after they have evolved. Finally, the author brings up the idea t...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, finally, first, furthermore, may, nonetheless, so, in contrast

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 7.30242825607 41% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 22.412803532 67% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 30.3222958057 89% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 5.01324503311 20% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1154.0 1373.03311258 84% => OK
No of words: 225.0 270.72406181 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.12888888889 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87298334621 4.04702891845 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60993732482 2.5805825403 101% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 145.348785872 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.515555555556 0.540411800872 95% => OK
syllable_count: 341.1 419.366225166 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 12.0 8.23620309051 146% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.5960976158 49.2860985944 60% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.7692307692 110.228320801 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.3076923077 21.698381199 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.69230769231 7.06452816374 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0377231998991 0.272083759551 14% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0174641048388 0.0996497079465 18% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0151229529496 0.0662205650399 23% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0242737421322 0.162205337803 15% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00832001697067 0.0443174109184 19% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.3589403974 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 53.8541721854 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.0289183223 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 12.2367328918 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.92 8.42419426049 94% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 63.6247240618 77% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.7273730684 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.

Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.