TPO 46

Essay topics:

TPO 46

The reading and the lecturer are both about changing a traditional method related to medical services to a new one. The writer of the essay uses three reason to support his/her argument. However, the lecturer opposes all of them by his/her ideas.

The author of the reading feels that by using electronical systems to save records of a medical center, the money which has spent on buying paper can be saved. In contrast, the professor believes that it is not a practical solution because a doctor needs to keep some documents for legall concerns. For instance, the paper of important issues must be availabe all the time to be cited in different situations.

The reading refers to errors made in human handwritings which will disapear by computer standardization alphabet. Alebiet, the lecturer challenges this notion by stating impossiblity of elimination of paper because the stuff needs to have the doctor handwritngs.

The passage denotes to the effects of saving information on the computer to aid to the researchers who need to draw information of medical offices. Converesly, the lecturer make a challege on this opinion by explaining access to data is restricted due to privacy law. Thus, there is no difference between using paper or digital documentation, lack of permision to gain information is the same rule.

Votes
Average: 8.3 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, thus, for instance, in contrast

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 7.30242825607 27% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 12.0772626932 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 22.412803532 45% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 30.3222958057 125% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.01324503311 199% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1114.0 1373.03311258 81% => OK
No of words: 217.0 270.72406181 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.133640553 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8380880478 4.04702891845 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93215779274 2.5805825403 114% => OK
Unique words: 133.0 145.348785872 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.612903225806 0.540411800872 113% => OK
syllable_count: 355.5 419.366225166 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.9103343207 49.2860985944 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.272727273 110.228320801 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7272727273 21.698381199 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.36363636364 7.06452816374 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.273410129551 0.272083759551 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0830660917322 0.0996497079465 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0840374069903 0.0662205650399 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135779343546 0.162205337803 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0725146565443 0.0443174109184 164% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.3589403974 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 53.8541721854 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 12.2367328918 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.6 8.42419426049 114% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 63.6247240618 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.