tpo 48
The lecture and the reading both discuss the decline in the frog species. The reading provides three ways to prevent the decline in the frog’s population. The lecture refutes each of the reading methods, saying that each method has a problem.
First of all, the reading argues that pesticides are the main cause that leads to frog’s extinction. If law prohibits the farmers from using pesticides near frogs habitat, that will save the frog’s population. However, the lecture opposes this point saying that it is not economical and fair to apply a new law. Some farmers would get a lot of disadvantages. For example, farmers are competing to have more crops, if the law prohibit the farmers from applying pesticides to their land, they will have lower yield than their competitors.
In addition, the reading states that fungus is another cause that leads to the decline in frog’s population. Fungus caused a disease to the frogs and leads to their extinction. Applying treatment on a large scale to the frogs will solve the problem. The lecture opposes this point by stating that it is not easy and it is expensive to apply the antifungal medication. According to the professor applying the medication need to capture each frog and apply the medication individually. Moreover, the antifungal will not prevent the spread of the disease to the offspring frogs.
Lastly, the reading makes an argument that preserving the lakes and the marches from human uses will save the frog from extinction. Lakes and marches are the best habitat for frogs. But, the lecture refutes this point by stating that the global warming is the main cause of the extinction of frogs and many other animals. Furthermore, preserving the lakes and marches will not solve the problem.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 161, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... decline in the frog's population. The lecture refutes each of the reading met...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, however, if, lastly, moreover, so, for example, in addition, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 5.04856512141 158% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 22.412803532 89% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 30.3222958057 102% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 5.01324503311 259% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1498.0 1373.03311258 109% => OK
No of words: 294.0 270.72406181 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09523809524 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14082457966 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65843690515 2.5805825403 103% => OK
Unique words: 125.0 145.348785872 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.425170068027 0.540411800872 79% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 445.5 419.366225166 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 13.0662251656 138% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 21.2450331126 75% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.054159415 49.2860985944 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.2222222222 110.228320801 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.3333333333 21.698381199 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.44444444444 7.06452816374 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 4.45695364238 179% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.382489357533 0.272083759551 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.134569456373 0.0996497079465 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0954381437198 0.0662205650399 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.24222143173 0.162205337803 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0547646695583 0.0443174109184 124% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.3589403974 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 53.8541721854 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.0289183223 76% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.0 12.2367328918 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.92 8.42419426049 94% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 63.6247240618 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.7273730684 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.498013245 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.