tpo 50

Essay topics:

tpo 50

The reading passage claims that scholars are investigating a project sending humans to the mars as well as the moon. But it may create some problems owing to the fact that it is far away than the moon and the project might be impossible at this time. However, the lecturer finds all the ideas dubious and presents some evidence to refute them all.

First, the author embraces the idea that mission to the mars will take two years and supply foods, water, and oxygen is a hard task to do in comparison with the moon mission. In contrast, the lecturer underlines the idea that astronauts can rely on hydroponics. In fact, they can grow some plants in water, which require less space. In this way, not only can they recycle wastewater and drink it but also can use from oxygen released by these plants.

The author also asserts that astronauts on Mars are in the zero-gravity environment of space and it might create some deleterious effects on their bodies, muscle mass, and bone density. On the contrary, the professor brings up the idea that many astronauts spend more time on some space stations and they use several techniques to cope with this situation like regular exercises.

Finally, as set forth by the author space radiations emitted by the sun also might have negative effects on astronauts because there is no magnetic shield to protect astronauts like the shield preserve people on the earth. Conversely, the speaker dismisses this issue due to the fact that these radiations are not dangerous all the time. In fact, they put people's health into danger occasionally. Also, space crafts could be equipped with special instruments. That being so, astronauts can stay in shielded areas in time where the radiations are severe.

Votes
Average: 0.3 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 334, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...nts in water, which require less space. In this way, not only can they recycle was...
^^
Line 7, column 555, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n time where the radiations are severe.
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, conversely, finally, first, however, may, so, well, in contrast, in fact, as well as, on the contrary

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 5.04856512141 218% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 22.412803532 107% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 30.3222958057 122% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1451.0 1373.03311258 106% => OK
No of words: 296.0 270.72406181 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.90202702703 5.08290768461 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50590746522 2.5805825403 97% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 145.348785872 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.564189189189 0.540411800872 104% => OK
syllable_count: 445.5 419.366225166 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.51434878587 198% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.117260459 49.2860985944 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.642857143 110.228320801 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1428571429 21.698381199 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.06452816374 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.3589403974 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 53.8541721854 109% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.14 12.2367328918 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.99 8.42419426049 95% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 63.6247240618 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.

Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.