tpo 53
The reading passage claims that imposing the higher tax on the cigarette or unhealthy food is highly beneficial for every given society and it creates a vast sum of a budget for the government. However, the lecturer finds all the ideas dubious and presents some evidence to refute them all.
First, the author contends that high taxes will encourage people to avoid unhealthy behaviors like smoking or consumption of unhealthy foods. Conversely, the lecturer brings up the idea that higher taxes will not result in healthy life owing to the fact that people will rely on lower qualities of foods and cigarettes, which increase the risk of unhealthy behaviors.
Furthermore, the author holds the view that these higher taxes are fair because when people with unhealthy behaviors get sick, they create medical cost. On the contrary, the professor underlines the fact that the cost is unfair because it does not take the income into consideration. In fact, it creates the greater burden on people with less income than people with higher revenue.
Finally, as set forth by the author higher taxes will be beneficial for the government because they can spend the budget on an improvement of public facilities and so forth. In contrast, the speaker dismisses this issue due to the fact that higher taxes will create millions of dollars for the government, which make them dependent on this substantial amount of budget and they do not like to lose this opportunity. In fact, the government might not be forceful enough to enact strict laws to prevent smoking in the public or parks and any other places as well as the unhealthy foods.
To put it in a nutshell, the author does not take many facts into account while being critical of those facts could add to the logic of each reason.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, finally, first, furthermore, however, if, so, well, while, in contrast, in fact, as well as, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.4613686534 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 5.04856512141 158% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 22.412803532 94% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 30.3222958057 129% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.01324503311 160% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1491.0 1373.03311258 109% => OK
No of words: 303.0 270.72406181 112% => OK
Chars per words: 4.92079207921 5.08290768461 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17215713816 4.04702891845 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48572041859 2.5805825403 96% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 145.348785872 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.541254125413 0.540411800872 100% => OK
syllable_count: 450.9 419.366225166 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 21.2450331126 127% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 44.2253806939 49.2860985944 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.545454545 110.228320801 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.5454545455 21.698381199 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.9090909091 7.06452816374 154% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.27373068433 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.3589403974 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 53.8541721854 98% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 11.0289183223 114% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 12.2367328918 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.1 8.42419426049 96% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 63.6247240618 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.7273730684 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.498013245 122% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.