Reading passage says, due to climate change, lands were dried up. So, they wanted to prevent this from happening. The best way is to plant a tree, and the best way to keep these trees is, to use a box-shaped device to store air-conditioned water for the plant during drought. However, many of the scientists are against this for the following reasons. However, the lecturer says, those reasons are not convincing.
First, reading passage says, this is a very expensive tool because combating drought means planting millions of trees and because it costs a lot of money. But the lecturer says, the trees get bigger, so devices get removed very easily. In addition, the devices can be reused more than 20 times. Therefore, the costs are reasonable.
Second, as a reading passage says, asking for help from people who are trapped in drought is unreasonable because it has no benefit for them. However, the lecturer says, it is true that people are being asked to look after plants that they cannot eat as their food source, but Those items can store water, not just for the plant but for everyone. They can even plant vegetables or use branches to burn. All of this is a good incentive for indigenous people to care for plants.
Third, the reading passage says, when the plant grows, it can no longer be used that device. Sometimes it does not rain for six months. However, the lecturer says, the grown plant can easily survive environmental conditions as its entire young age has long roots to extract water from underwater reserves. So, for that reason the plant survives without the box.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, look, second, so, therefore, third, in addition, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.4613686534 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 12.0772626932 50% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 22.412803532 98% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 30.3222958057 79% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 5.01324503311 20% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1322.0 1373.03311258 96% => OK
No of words: 275.0 270.72406181 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.80727272727 5.08290768461 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07223819929 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.41030844019 2.5805825403 93% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 145.348785872 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.552727272727 0.540411800872 102% => OK
syllable_count: 396.9 419.366225166 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.51434878587 198% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 13.0662251656 130% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 21.2450331126 75% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 50.5947328249 49.2860985944 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 77.7647058824 110.228320801 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.1764705882 21.698381199 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.70588235294 7.06452816374 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.27373068433 187% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.100552906427 0.272083759551 37% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.038386406676 0.0996497079465 39% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.033739547028 0.0662205650399 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0652205747913 0.162205337803 40% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.033379618113 0.0443174109184 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.3 13.3589403974 70% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.16 53.8541721854 134% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 11.0289183223 65% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.32 12.2367328918 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.53 8.42419426049 89% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 63.6247240618 85% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 10.7273730684 56% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.498013245 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.