TPO-9 INTEGRATED ESSAY

Essay topics:

TPO-9 INTEGRATED ESSAY

The lecture and the passage are both about Fuel cell engines. The reading claims that fuel cell engines have myriad of advantages over internal-combustion engines. However, the lecturer does not feel that fuel cell engines are as beneficial as the author assumes.

First of all, lecturer thinks that use of hydrogen to generate electricity is not a solution. Hydrogen is not easily available in the usable form. In order to utilize energy and create electricity from hydrogen, it is very necessary to make it in pure liquid form which is a highly artificial substance. On the other hand author assumes fuel cell engines are based on renewable resources.

Secondly, Production of pure hydrogen creates lot of pollution which will affect the environment. The purification process of hydrogen require lot of energy and burning of oil and coal. Considering these aspects lecturer thinks that fuel cell engines are not at all a perfect source of power.

Thirdly, It is also not a cost saving option because of the highly expensive manufacturing process. Its manufacturing require the use of platinum which is a rarely available and highly expensive metal. Manufacturers have not been so far successful in replacing the metal platinum with another material. While the reading states that it is an economically competitive to use fuel cell engines and people have to spend very less money for that.

Votes
Average: 0.3 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 205, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'aspects'' or 'aspect's'?
Suggestion: aspects'; aspect's
...ning of oil and coal. Considering these aspects lecturer thinks that fuel cell engines ...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, second, secondly, so, third, thirdly, while, first of all, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 22.412803532 54% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 30.3222958057 92% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1174.0 1373.03311258 86% => OK
No of words: 227.0 270.72406181 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.1718061674 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88156143495 4.04702891845 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89902653132 2.5805825403 112% => OK
Unique words: 125.0 145.348785872 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.550660792952 0.540411800872 102% => OK
syllable_count: 390.6 419.366225166 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 8.23620309051 49% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 21.2450331126 75% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 25.298725466 49.2860985944 51% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 83.8571428571 110.228320801 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.2142857143 21.698381199 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.28571428571 7.06452816374 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.3589403974 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 53.8541721854 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.41 12.2367328918 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.67 8.42419426049 103% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 63.6247240618 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.7273730684 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.498013245 80% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.

Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.