TPO No.6
Hails damage the farming products in the USA, and therefore a method called cloud seeding is used to reduce the hail and its damges. The author of the reading provides three reasons to support this method, however the professor rejects them one by one.
First of all, the writer points out some experiments done in a labratory show the effectiveness of this method. In fact, scientists have added silver iodide into the vapor and found that the snow were forming instead of hails. However, the professor rejects this reason bystating that this experiment may not be effective in the real condition. Actually, any kind of precipitation may shape in the cloud ouside of the labratory.
Secondly, the passage suggest that in Asia some coutries used this method in their cities. The main purpose of them was to control rain which was successful. On contrary,the lecturer rebuts this reason too. He asserts that these result cannot be repeated in the USA farms because cities are filled with air pollution which is utilitarian in foriming water drops. In fact, pollution particeles are favorable for vapor in clouds to prduce dropes around them. However, such a condition is not presented in farmlands.
Fianlly, the writer states that some local studies demonstrate the positive influence of this method. For example, one studied evaluted the damages after the using of this methodin a particular area and result were convincing. On theother hand, the professor does not advocate this reason. He mentions that, this study were done in the neabring of the east and north area of whrer the method were used. Thus, the results are not reliable, simple because they might be the cosequences of natural variation in whether and not of this method.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-10-28 | Mostafa1367 | 3 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 170, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , the
...l rain which was successful. On contrary,the lecturer rebuts this reason too. He ass...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, first, however, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, as to, for example, in fact, kind of, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.4613686534 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 22.412803532 116% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 30.3222958057 129% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.01324503311 160% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1461.0 1373.03311258 106% => OK
No of words: 289.0 270.72406181 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0553633218 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53008620227 2.5805825403 98% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 145.348785872 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.59169550173 0.540411800872 109% => OK
syllable_count: 453.6 419.366225166 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 13.0662251656 130% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.3956426402 49.2860985944 60% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 85.9411764706 110.228320801 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0 21.698381199 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.35294117647 7.06452816374 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.27373068433 187% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.3589403974 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 53.8541721854 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.77 12.2367328918 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.29 8.42419426049 110% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 63.6247240618 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.