TPO2 Integrated writing--In many organizations, perhaps the best way to approach certain new projects is to assemble a group of people into a team. Having a team of people attack a project offers several advantages...
Summarise the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on specific points made reading passage.
The passage claims that the best way to approach projects is to assemble a group of people into a team because there are a lot of advantages of group work. However, the professor in the lecture opposes to this statement by using a sample of a company which used the group work to approach a project.
First of all, the passage claims that taking part in a group process can be very rewarding for individual members of the team. This might be true for the members who do not contribute as much as others. The professor points out that individual members who have done well in the projects do not feel fare about the rewards because there are some members in the team taking the free ride with them.
More over, the passage believes that with the numbers of people involved and the greater resources they possess, a group should complete the task more quickly. However, the professor shows that the company which adopted the group work for a project found out the project was not moving as quickly as they expected. In fact, it took the group so long to conform themselves to the group's consensus and they spent a lot of time on meetings.
Finally, the passage claims that the individual team member has a much better chance to get recognized working in a group then working as individual. However, the professor strongly refutes this point. His concern is that when some of the members become influential in the group, they will ignore the opinion from other members, who know that the direction of the work is not correct. When the whole project fails, all the members will be blamed, including those who tried to oppose the original idea
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 380, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'groups'' or 'group's'?
Suggestion: groups'; group's
...up so long to conform themselves to the groups consensus and they spent a lot of time ...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 228, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...es this point. His concern is that when some of the members become influential in the group...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, however, so, then, well, in fact, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 7.30242825607 27% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 16.0 12.0772626932 132% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 22.412803532 89% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 30.3222958057 115% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1357.0 1373.03311258 99% => OK
No of words: 291.0 270.72406181 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.66323024055 5.08290768461 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.33486884477 2.5805825403 90% => OK
Unique words: 147.0 145.348785872 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.505154639175 0.540411800872 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 406.8 419.366225166 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 21.2450331126 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.2371705855 49.2860985944 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.083333333 110.228320801 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.25 21.698381199 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.58333333333 7.06452816374 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 4.45695364238 22% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.208330969509 0.272083759551 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0851511581367 0.0996497079465 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0917795341409 0.0662205650399 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144648072916 0.162205337803 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0854148355304 0.0443174109184 193% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.3589403974 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 53.8541721854 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.04 12.2367328918 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.65 8.42419426049 91% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 63.6247240618 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.498013245 110% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.