Tpo22
The author expresses some reasons which indicate that Ethanol is not an appropriate replacement for gasoline. The lecturer, however, refutes the claim since he believes that the arguments are not persuasive.
First, the reading casts doubt on the influence of ethanol on global warming. It indicates that ethanol cannot be regarded as a solution for the global warming. Nevertheless, the professor thinks that other aspects of this issue should be considered. He means that, although the ethanol releases CO2 into the atmosphere like gasoline, its plant can absorb a large percentage of CO2 as well.
Second, using some plants like corn, which are utilized as sources of ethanol leads to a reduction in the food product, because many people cannot use these crops. On the other hand, the lecturer mentions that the part of the plant which consume differs from the given portion that the ethanol is come from. Therefore, producing ethanol is not related to reducing the amount the number of plants accessible for food.
Third, the ethanol cannot compete with the gasoline in terms of price. In spite of the fact that the final price of ethanol is comparatively equal to gasoline, the government spends a high subsidy on ethanol. On the contrary, the professor thinks that this competition will be eliminated if people buy more ethanol due to the fact that an increase in purchasing a product results in decreasing its price. In other words, the more a product sells, the lower the price will reach.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, nevertheless, second, so, therefore, third, well, in other words, in spite of, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 0.0 7.30242825607 0% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 22.412803532 80% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 30.3222958057 99% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1260.0 1373.03311258 92% => OK
No of words: 249.0 270.72406181 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.06024096386 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97237131171 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58742400617 2.5805825403 100% => OK
Unique words: 139.0 145.348785872 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.558232931727 0.540411800872 103% => OK
syllable_count: 394.2 419.366225166 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.1504218839 49.2860985944 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.9230769231 110.228320801 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1538461538 21.698381199 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.2307692308 7.06452816374 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.414793601618 0.272083759551 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.147180630783 0.0996497079465 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0770335353923 0.0662205650399 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.234123851999 0.162205337803 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0675970512747 0.0443174109184 153% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.3589403974 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 53.8541721854 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 12.2367328918 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.38 8.42419426049 99% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 63.6247240618 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.7273730684 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.