According to the reading, using wave-energy facilities to generate energy is highly promising because of three reasons: they are highly stable and reliable source of energy, they are not harmful to environment, and they are not visually interrupting. However, the lecturer poses an opposing view: the optimistic view upon the wave farms might even be a mere illusion.
First of all, the stability of the energy generator is questionable. The reading claims that it is easy to predict the frequency and intensity of wave as the weather of costal areas, where wave farms are located, is relatively stable. However, as the wave-energy facility requires newly developed, high-end technology to be placed in a harsh environment, the facilities often struggle with malfunctioning. Because of that, the energy supply of the wave farms fluctuates.
Secondly, the wave-energy facility possesses possible harm to the environment. Unlike the reading saying that there is risk of contamination, floats of the facility actually contains harmful chemical called lubricant. The chemical enables turbine or other parts to move smoothly, but it is highly toxic and have adverse effect on environment when the leakage occurs.
In addition, wave farms are visually unappealing. Although the reading claims that the converters are small and usually not visible, in fact, they are colored with bright colors in order to be detected easily. Furthermore, there are lots of floats installed close to the shore, which makes it easy for visitors to spot the facilities.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 75, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...ve-energy facilities to generate energy is highly promising because of three reasons: they are high...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, first, furthermore, however, second, secondly, so, in addition, in fact, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 10.4613686534 163% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 12.0772626932 58% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 22.412803532 49% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 30.3222958057 96% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1310.0 1373.03311258 95% => OK
No of words: 242.0 270.72406181 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.4132231405 5.08290768461 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94415379849 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92062245364 2.5805825403 113% => OK
Unique words: 140.0 145.348785872 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.578512396694 0.540411800872 107% => OK
syllable_count: 421.2 419.366225166 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.8261773446 49.2860985944 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.166666667 110.228320801 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1666666667 21.698381199 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.33333333333 7.06452816374 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.343175434048 0.272083759551 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.154291720557 0.0996497079465 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.177282526594 0.0662205650399 268% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.20712345808 0.162205337803 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.117730177313 0.0443174109184 266% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.3589403974 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 53.8541721854 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 5.55761589404 202% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.0289183223 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 12.2367328918 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.72 8.42419426049 115% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 63.6247240618 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 10.7273730684 144% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.