In a cashless society, people use more credit cards. Cashless society seems to be a reality, and how realistic do you think it might be? What are the advantages and disadvantages of this phenomenon?
<span style="font-size: 19.36px;">Recently, the phenomenon of using credit cards and its corresponding impacts has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that, the matter of cashless society is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that using electronic cash could be a plus, and I will analyze that through this essay before concluding.
From a social standpoint, living in the reality of less using cash provides the society with some noticeable effects, which are rooted in the fact that the merits of saving the environment as well as avoiding city traffic are extremely bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I participated in an academic survey which results in the safety of electronic payment methods. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both internet shopping and improving the hectic lifestyle due to living in cashless reality apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, using internet payments might increase the risk of losing banking private information. Moreover, the fundamental aspects of internet hacking issues could lead to distrusting to modern methods. As a tangible example, some scientific research conducted by a prestigious institute has asserted that the downsides of security loophole are correlated negatively with the increasing rate of internet fraud. However, with regards to the advancement in information technology, nowadays acquiring high-tech reality could be an advantage for all citizens.
To recapitulate, I pen down saying that although some opponents argued that the disadvantages of using online payment are obvious, I profoundly inclined to believe that, despite the side effects, using credit cards and online transactions have numerous positive outcomes. Not to mention that it could help us to fight against the greenhouse gasses issues.</span><br>
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, however, if, moreover, so, thus, well, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 5.94088669951 202% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 20.0 20.9802955665 95% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 31.9359605911 135% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.75862068966 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1687.0 1207.87684729 140% => OK
No of words: 296.0 242.827586207 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.69932432432 5.00649968141 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.42019892448 2.71678728327 126% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 139.433497537 133% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.625 0.580463131201 108% => OK
syllable_count: 524.7 379.143842365 138% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.7037712123 50.4703680194 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.583333333 104.977214359 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.6666666667 20.9669160288 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.08333333333 7.25397266985 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.158206796301 0.242375264174 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0488329879415 0.0925447433944 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0385792841759 0.071462118173 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0873620910124 0.151781067708 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0365849332967 0.0609392437508 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.8 12.6369458128 141% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.2 53.1260098522 57% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.9458128079 137% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.08 11.5310837438 139% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.69 8.32886699507 128% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 55.0591133005 200% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.