Recently, the phenomenon of applying electronic payments and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that eliminating cash is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both consecutrive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am incliend to believe that using credit cards can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From the social standpoint, omitting paper money can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that globalozation, as well as saving presious resources, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered more environmental opportunities. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both economic balance and financial restrictions apparently can be seen.
within the realm of time management, substituting cash with credit cards might increase the consequences of financial crisis. Moreover, fundamental aspects of electronic payment relate to this reality that the demerits of eliminating paper money pertain to required technological infrastructure. As a tangible example, a scientific research undertook by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of a cashless community is correlated negatively with increased rate of crime. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconcieved nition of digital payment.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of applying credit cards instead of cash far outwigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of electronic payment prove the significance of preserving environment, but also pinpoint highly advanced implications.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Within
...l restrictions apparently can be seen. within the realm of time management, substitut...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 31.9359605911 100% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.75862068966 174% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1515.0 1207.87684729 125% => OK
No of words: 259.0 242.827586207 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.84942084942 5.00649968141 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01166760082 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.37900711193 2.71678728327 124% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 139.433497537 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.667953667954 0.580463131201 115% => OK
syllable_count: 486.0 379.143842365 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.5312815656 50.4703680194 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.25 104.977214359 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5833333333 20.9669160288 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.108435351901 0.242375264174 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0338059472181 0.0925447433944 37% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0348317913118 0.071462118173 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0590209307559 0.151781067708 39% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.028873585734 0.0609392437508 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 12.6369458128 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 24.78 53.1260098522 47% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.9458128079 137% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.65 11.5310837438 144% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.14 8.32886699507 134% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 55.0591133005 193% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.5123152709 162% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.