Recently, the phenomenon of a cashless society and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of cashless markets is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that electronic card can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, N can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that N, as well as N, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered N. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both N and N apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, N might increase the consequences of N. Moreover, fundamental aspects of N relate to this reality that the demerits of N pertain to N. As a tangible example, a scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of N is correlated negatively with N. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of N.
To recapitulate, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of credit card far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of cashless transfers prove the significance of payment methods, but also pinpoint social implications.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 31.9359605911 94% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1203.0 1207.87684729 100% => OK
No of words: 231.0 242.827586207 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.20779220779 5.00649968141 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89854898053 3.92707691288 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.29921255881 2.71678728327 121% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 139.433497537 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.627705627706 0.580463131201 108% => OK
syllable_count: 378.0 379.143842365 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.5024630542 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.2481422066 50.4703680194 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.25 104.977214359 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.25 20.9669160288 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 2.91625615764 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.100582765679 0.242375264174 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0299920747772 0.0925447433944 32% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0350485337682 0.071462118173 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0537402857076 0.151781067708 35% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0414822068387 0.0609392437508 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 12.6369458128 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 53.1260098522 98% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.9458128079 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 11.5310837438 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.12 8.32886699507 122% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 55.0591133005 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.3980295567 92% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.5123152709 124% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.