Euthanasia

Essay topics:

Euthanasia

The effect of euthanasia, which was always debatable, has now more controversial. The substantial influence of euthanasia has sparked the controversy over the potential impact of this trend on medical treatments over the years. It can be agreed that euthanasia should not be legalised. This essay will elaborate how creative caring and medical advances can be the solutions for this issue and thus will lead to a logical conclusion.

At the outset, there are a myriad of reasons why having a creative and compassionate caring can tackle euthanasia, but the most conspicuous one stems from the fact that patients with terminal illness are very vulnerable. An appropriate caring with advanced treatments may help relieve suffering and prolong their life. As an illustration, terminally ill patients will feel happier if they are cured in special care in advanced facilities. Therefore, voluntary euthanasia is unnecessary.

Approaches to deal with the setbacks originated by euthanasia are innumerable, but the most effective one is that governments should invest generously in medical research, which is not impractical and unattainable but comprehensible and feasible. More money in medical research will encourage scientists to invent more treatment methods as well as invent new kinds of medicine or vaccination. For instance, previous patients of cancer had no medicine to cure but now some types of vaccination are introduced to the public to prevent cancer.

In conclusion, it is clearly a problem of complexity that no solution is short-term. However, I believe that a combination of several measures outlined above would constitute a good way to solve the problem.

Votes
Average: 8.8 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 28, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'myriads'?
Suggestion: myriads
...nclusion. At the outset, there are a myriad of reasons why having a creative and co...
^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, may, so, therefore, thus, well, for instance, in conclusion, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.5418719212 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 6.10837438424 180% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 8.36945812808 131% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 20.9802955665 62% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 31.9359605911 97% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1421.0 1207.87684729 118% => OK
No of words: 260.0 242.827586207 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.46538461538 5.00649968141 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01553427287 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16063762199 2.71678728327 116% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 139.433497537 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.623076923077 0.580463131201 107% => OK
syllable_count: 450.9 379.143842365 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.7956966379 50.4703680194 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.307692308 104.977214359 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 20.9669160288 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.84615384615 7.25397266985 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.238936711341 0.242375264174 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104034776594 0.0925447433944 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.124524303315 0.071462118173 174% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12652616993 0.151781067708 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0935138642843 0.0609392437508 153% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 12.6369458128 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 53.1260098522 80% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.9458128079 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 11.5310837438 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.91 8.32886699507 119% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 55.0591133005 158% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.