The effect of lazy journalism in today’s digitalised world which has always been debatable, has now become more controversial. The substantial influence of ideal reporting in this contemporary works has sparked the controversy over the potential impact of this trend in an integral part of the society in recent years. It can be agreed that downsides of inaccurate media in the modern era are too dire to ignore. This essay will elaborate both the definition and causes of imperfect journalism and will provide a well-weighed conclusion.
At the outset, lazy journalism is defined as a report lack of original idea and journalust do not check the accuracy of the information they report. Writer gather information from a number of sources and simply collects it together without any examination. Journalists use computers to work which enables them to copy some sentences or even images from some online sources. Lazy journalism happens when journalist do not do their homework, do not check the accuracy of the information they find.
There are plethora reasons of sluggish journalism in today’s digitalised world. But the most conspicuous one lies in the fact that people do not care about the authenticity only seeking for entertainment instead of insight reports. Furthermore, in some countries where originality is not emphasised and where plagiarism is not penalised, the lazy journalism may become rampant.
The above presented dissertation illustrates both the definition and causes of irrelevant journalism in this modern era. And it is evident that it has various drawbacks and it is should be handle pragmatically.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 10, column 177, Rule ID: IS_SHOULD[1]
Message: Did you mean 'it'?
Suggestion: it
...nt that it has various drawbacks and it is should be handle pragmatically.
^^
Line 10, column 190, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'handled'?
Suggestion: handled
...s various drawbacks and it is should be handle pragmatically.
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, may, so, then, well
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 8.36945812808 119% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 20.9802955665 76% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 31.9359605911 103% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.75862068966 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1394.0 1207.87684729 115% => OK
No of words: 257.0 242.827586207 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.42412451362 5.00649968141 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00390054096 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13060591972 2.71678728327 115% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 139.433497537 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.603112840467 0.580463131201 104% => OK
syllable_count: 441.9 379.143842365 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.5024630542 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.3427876093 50.4703680194 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 107.230769231 104.977214359 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7692307692 20.9669160288 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.84615384615 7.25397266985 39% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 6.9802955665 57% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 2.75862068966 254% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.240887277722 0.242375264174 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0785372851224 0.0925447433944 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0729917623133 0.071462118173 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131896512184 0.151781067708 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0255811420882 0.0609392437508 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 12.6369458128 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 53.1260098522 82% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.9458128079 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 11.5310837438 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.49 8.32886699507 114% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 55.0591133005 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.3980295567 92% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.