Medical technology is responsible for the human's life expectancy. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
In the past fifty years, modern technology in the field of medicine has rapidly advanced. In this essay, I shall discus in agreement that humans have increased their life expectancy far from past generations. Incentivizing holistic and innovative approaches has been the most
There are many reasons why technologies have significantly increased the lives of humans. One main reason is that medicine is using cutting edge machinery to learn about different diseases. Neither governments, nor general public are having ant negative impact from such results. Therefore, advantages is medicine have increased our whole health care systems. For example, hospitals incorporate MRI's, cat-scans and e-xray technology to further understand the human body. The images that are printed help doctors determine cures for different disease. For example, chemo therapy is now used to cure cancer.
Firstly, governments have increased resources for doctors and health care specialists. Research suggests, that spending time and monetary value in order to search for cures of different disease can have positive outcomes. Secondly, organizations such as research centers and medical schools trial new medicine for patients through the use of different lab stations. Thirdly, the results of such studies help prevent future disease or invent new strategies of use.
In conclusion, we have a clear picture of the positive influences of such technology, past generations didn't have a chance at such cures. The future predicts, in my opinion forms of healthcare systems are created for helping people to achieve better health. Life expectancy can be seen significantly growing, people have spend almost a lifetime finding cures for the treatment of disease.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 216, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...rent diseases. Neither governments, nor general public are having ant negative impact from suc...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 104, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...es of such technology, past generations didnt have a chance at such cures. The futur...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 323, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'spent'.
Suggestion: spent
...seen significantly growing, people have spend almost a lifetime finding cures for the...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, third, thirdly, for example, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 6.10837438424 49% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 5.94088669951 67% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 20.9802955665 48% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 31.9359605911 94% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.75862068966 35% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1483.0 1207.87684729 123% => OK
No of words: 264.0 242.827586207 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.61742424242 5.00649968141 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03089032464 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82483076441 2.71678728327 104% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 139.433497537 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.643939393939 0.580463131201 111% => OK
syllable_count: 466.2 379.143842365 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 12.6551724138 126% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.5024630542 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.4496698523 50.4703680194 54% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 92.6875 104.977214359 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.5 20.9669160288 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.4375 7.25397266985 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.33497536946 56% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 6.9802955665 158% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.114562281822 0.242375264174 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0399866938397 0.0925447433944 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.034275282935 0.071462118173 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0721940560587 0.151781067708 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.012258625346 0.0609392437508 20% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 12.6369458128 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.31 53.1260098522 72% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.9458128079 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.02 11.5310837438 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.51 8.32886699507 114% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 55.0591133005 154% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.94827586207 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.3980295567 81% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.