Nowadays TV has become an essential part of life. Medium to spread news & awareness and for some it acts like a companion. What is your opinion?
The important of TV in human life, which was always debatable, has now become more controversial. The substantial influence of television has sparked a controversy over the potential impact of this trend on individuals in recent years. Public’s opinions about the television vary from person to person as some people say that misuse of TV put individuals on edge, while others say TV channels play an increasingly important role in awareness. This essay focuses on the effect of television on everyday life and thus will lead to a logical conclusion.
At the outset, there are numerous reasons why TV is dangerous, but the most conspicuous one steams from the fact that many people spend too much time watching TV since a possible explanation for this is might be that overuse of TV will cause serious injury to eyes. For instance, recent evidence suggests people will blind if they watch TV daily for a decade. Hence, misuse of TV can play a vital role to damage one’s health.
Nevertheless, some people adopt an opposing view and tend to believe that TV is also significant for a companion as there are innumerable reasons for that, but the most predominant one is that television provides company for elderly cause these results are likely to be related to decrease the depression and loneliness of old people. As an illustration, extensive research has shown that elderly who watch TV for two hours per day release better happy hormone. Thus, TV programs can play a crucial role for old people, and spread news and awareness.
From what has been discussed above, it can be concluded that TV is prominent and there is abundant room for further progress in determining the way to fully utilize TV.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 170, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...etermining the way to fully utilize TV.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, nevertheless, so, thus, while, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.5418719212 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 20.9802955665 67% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 31.9359605911 100% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1432.0 1207.87684729 119% => OK
No of words: 289.0 242.827586207 119% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95501730104 5.00649968141 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8016786297 2.71678728327 103% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 139.433497537 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.59169550173 0.580463131201 102% => OK
syllable_count: 448.2 379.143842365 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.931034482759 322% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.5024630542 127% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 79.6752706951 50.4703680194 158% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.181818182 104.977214359 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.2727272727 20.9669160288 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.90909090909 7.25397266985 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.235995915904 0.242375264174 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.087229877186 0.0925447433944 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0463192376554 0.071462118173 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136851216824 0.151781067708 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0432700881655 0.0609392437508 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 12.6369458128 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 53.1260098522 85% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.9458128079 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 11.5310837438 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.91 8.32886699507 107% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 55.0591133005 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.94827586207 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.3980295567 119% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.5123152709 124% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.