One of the most conspicuous trends of today's world is the colossal upsurge as TV has become an essential part of life. There is a widespread concern that some people say life is very difficult to run without TV but proponents are against it. In my opinion, this apprehension is warranted and merits serious considerations.
There is a deluge of arguments in favour of my stance but the most preponderant one lies in the fact TV is a source of news, awareness, and so on. In fact, not only do TV helps to get rid of loneliness but also provide knowledge of scientific development happening in this world. Many new innovations take place influenced by the TV. We can find overwhelming evidence in support of the fact that it is also a medium to spread news very quickly. Needless to say, all these merits stand for the companion of human in good stead, as far as better life is concerned.
On the other hand, one detrimental aspect of this argument is that TV makes a person out of contact with the society. Many illicit activities are taking place because of theTV programs. The endangered wild animals are being killed by traffickers because of the information about them through the TV. For a salient example, there is a myriad of researches by the various government bodies that show that Australian teenagers are into drug influenced by the movies they watch on TV. Hence, it is apparent why many are against the TV as an essential part of life.
In view of the arguments outlined above, one can conclude that the benefits of TV in human life are indeed too great to ignore.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, so, in fact, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 10.5418719212 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 6.10837438424 33% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 5.94088669951 101% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 31.9359605911 147% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1306.0 1207.87684729 108% => OK
No of words: 281.0 242.827586207 116% => OK
Chars per words: 4.64768683274 5.00649968141 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09427095027 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73838733805 2.71678728327 101% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 139.433497537 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.576512455516 0.580463131201 99% => OK
syllable_count: 411.3 379.143842365 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.57093596059 95% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6551724138 111% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.8607461127 50.4703680194 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.2857142857 104.977214359 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0714285714 20.9669160288 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.78571428571 7.25397266985 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 2.75862068966 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.250306157687 0.242375264174 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0786162970795 0.0925447433944 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0645744092942 0.071462118173 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140127900246 0.151781067708 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0558621488093 0.0609392437508 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 12.6369458128 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 53.1260098522 112% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.9458128079 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.69 11.5310837438 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.22 8.32886699507 99% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 55.0591133005 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.5123152709 95% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 67.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.