Personal Development is the base for professional development and advancing in one’s career. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Recently the phenomenon of personal improvement by career development and its corresponding impacts has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of self-development is highly beneficial, such issue regarded thoroughly both positive and constructive by a substantial number of individuals. I am tremendously inclined to believe that job progress can effectively impact on personality and I will discuss controversial aspects of that throughout this essay.
From the social standpoint, personality enhancement through job development can provide society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that self-disciplined as well as self-confidence. According to my personal experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment, which discovered that advancing in the job would affect the person's social skills and enhancement. Thus, the beneficial consequences of vocational advancing and self-development apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of professional life, career development might increase the consequences of ignoring personal life as well. Moreover, the fundamental aspects of progressing in one's job related to this reality that the demerits of professional enhancement pertain to less time spending for personal life. As a tangible example, scientific research undertook by a prestigious university has asserted that the downsides of focus on the job are correlated negatively with neglecting the day-to-day life. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of professional development leads to personal life ignorance.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of professional enhancement far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of personality improvement prove the significance of job opportunities, but also pinpoint specific implications.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.5418719212 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 5.94088669951 185% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 31.9359605911 119% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 5.75862068966 295% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1660.0 1207.87684729 137% => OK
No of words: 275.0 242.827586207 113% => OK
Chars per words: 6.03636363636 5.00649968141 121% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07223819929 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.59997061512 2.71678728327 133% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 139.433497537 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.614545454545 0.580463131201 106% => OK
syllable_count: 524.7 379.143842365 138% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.259933677 50.4703680194 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.333333333 104.977214359 132% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9166666667 20.9669160288 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.245691542959 0.242375264174 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0923614868539 0.0925447433944 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0569149886479 0.071462118173 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.133309855547 0.151781067708 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.042822966082 0.0609392437508 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.5 12.6369458128 146% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 23.77 53.1260098522 45% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 10.9458128079 141% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 18.05 11.5310837438 157% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.64 8.32886699507 128% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 55.0591133005 187% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.94827586207 136% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.