Personal development is the base for professional development and advancing in one’s career. To what extent do you agree?
It is indubitable that the recent phenomenon of personal growth is widely debated among the professionals with many people claiming that personal development is not a pre-requisite to one’s professional career. However, I strongly believe that living a healthy lifestyle and keeping a positive mindset has a vital role to play in the professional growth of a person. This essay will further elaborate on both sides and thus, will lead to a logical conclusion.
To begin with, there are various potential benefits of personal growth in one’s profession. Firstly, it is indispensable to have a positive outlook and to lead a healthy life than being sedentary. Moreover, resorting to current grooming styles and keeping one informed and updated to the latest happenings makes one confident and marketable in the long run. Last but not the least, it is essential to be technically sound and adaptable to the working environments which eventually shows your logical reasoning and problem-solving capabilities. All this contributes to the personal growth which are necessary to survive in today’s cut-throat competitions.
However, people who argue on professionalism balance their arguments on those who are unable to keep up with the pace of modern lifestyles and are more inclined to just academics. Moreover, these people remain confused, distracted and could not make decisions regarding their personal and work lives. For instance, people who are receptive to changes feel isolated, devastated and suffer early burnout in their careers. This kind of people is not suited to current environments.
In view of the arguments mentioned above, it is concluded that the merits associated with growing personally far outweighs the professional growth and therefore, it is the only way to have a successful professional stature and can lead one to his accomplishments.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, look, moreover, regarding, so, therefore, thus, for instance, kind of, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.5418719212 142% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 8.36945812808 179% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 20.9802955665 95% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 31.9359605911 128% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.75862068966 52% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1590.0 1207.87684729 132% => OK
No of words: 291.0 242.827586207 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.46391752577 5.00649968141 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.21806214936 2.71678728327 118% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 139.433497537 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.580756013746 0.580463131201 100% => OK
syllable_count: 503.1 379.143842365 133% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 4.6157635468 195% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.47012101 50.4703680194 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.307692308 104.977214359 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3846153846 20.9669160288 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.07692307692 7.25397266985 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.202185506607 0.242375264174 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0674320202147 0.0925447433944 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0825822564978 0.071462118173 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120466425696 0.151781067708 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0617307873461 0.0609392437508 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 12.6369458128 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 53.1260098522 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.9458128079 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.68 11.5310837438 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.94 8.32886699507 119% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 55.0591133005 174% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.