Professional workers like doctors, nurses and teachers make a greater contribution to society and so should be paid more than sports and entertainment personalities. To what extent do you agree or disagree.
Professional workers like doctors, nurses and teachers make a greater contribution to society and so should be paid more than sports and entertainment personalities. To what extent do you agree or disagree.
The importance of professional workers, which frequently generated a great deal of heated debate, has recently become even more controversial. Some proponents claim that professional workers like doctors, nurses and teachers make a greater contribution to society and so should be paid more than sports and entertainment personalities while others maintain that people working in media and sports are reasonably compensated. The essay will discuss both views and lead to a reasoned conclusion.
At the outset, there is a myriad of reasons why people laboring in clinical and educational professions should have a high salary package but the most conspicuous one stems from the fact that they spend their time and energy assisting people in society and adhere development of countries. For example, doctors need to work very hard in the hospital to save many patients' life from illnesses and teachers are responsible to cultivate our young generation for the national future thriving. Thus, their jobs are tremendously important and should be paid greatly.
Moving on the opposite argument putting forward by critics, some people believe that working in sports and entertainment is deserve to receive a high income. According to some recent studies, celebrities have to work under very high pressure in order to maintain good performance in their shows. Besides, they lose their private life because they are stalked by reporters and journalists in their daily life. Therefore, their huge incomes are perceivable and should be respected.
In summary, taking these points into consideration, from my personal perspective, I am inclined to believe that the money that is paid for celebrities is fair enough.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 363, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'patients'' or 'patient's'?
Suggestion: patients'; patient's
... very hard in the hospital to save many patients life from illnesses and teachers are re...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 125, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'deserved'.
Suggestion: deserved
... working in sports and entertainment is deserve to receive a high income. According to ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, if, so, therefore, thus, while, for example, in summary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.5418719212 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 8.36945812808 215% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 20.9802955665 95% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 31.9359605911 116% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 5.75862068966 191% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1619.0 1207.87684729 134% => OK
No of words: 298.0 242.827586207 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.43288590604 5.00649968141 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99992680421 2.71678728327 110% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 139.433497537 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.590604026846 0.580463131201 102% => OK
syllable_count: 502.2 379.143842365 132% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 74.541517759 50.4703680194 148% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.538461538 104.977214359 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9230769231 20.9669160288 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.30769230769 7.25397266985 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.12807881773 121% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.429587662637 0.242375264174 177% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.156958740912 0.0925447433944 170% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.234425774636 0.071462118173 328% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.305610405919 0.151781067708 201% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.370362520219 0.0609392437508 608% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 12.6369458128 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 53.1260098522 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.9458128079 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.51 11.5310837438 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.23 8.32886699507 111% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 55.0591133005 154% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.94827586207 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.5123152709 124% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.