In a social events, Being a good talker or a good listener which one is better
Recently, the phenomenon of the importance of being a good talker or listener in social activities and its corresponding impacts has sparked a heated debate. Although both of these actions are beneficial as they regarded by the substantial number of individuals both constructive and positive, There is no agreement whether which of them are more paramount. I am inclined to believe that a good listener is quite fundamental as it could develop some brilliant aspects for its adherents.
From a social standpoint, the idea of determining the significance of being a good speaker or listener in social events provides the society with noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact of modern communication. Firstly, from my own experience, when I was a pupil university, I performed an academic experiment which discovered these details. A good speaker can communicate well which is crucial in social interactions and expand their social activities. Furthermore, these people have the ability to address the difficulties by negotiating and discussing. Moreover, they have this capability to consult others and being win in conversations.
On the other hand, there is no doubt that a good listener has some advantages as well in comparison being a good talker in social activities. These people can recognize the valuable opportunities in the every society and group, and utilize them to boost, solve, develop or expand any system or activity. Besides, good listeners think carefully and have the ability to distinguish the differences, threatens, merits or drawbacks. Hence, they usually have logic actions and beheviour.
In conclusion, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the importance of being a good listener is far more outweigh than being a good speaker.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, firstly, furthermore, hence, if, moreover, so, well, while, in conclusion, no doubt, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 10.5418719212 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 6.10837438424 49% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 8.36945812808 167% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 20.9802955665 105% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 31.9359605911 94% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1536.0 1207.87684729 127% => OK
No of words: 285.0 242.827586207 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.38947368421 5.00649968141 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10876417139 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13251791909 2.71678728327 115% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 139.433497537 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.547368421053 0.580463131201 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 490.5 379.143842365 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 4.6157635468 152% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.73141411 50.4703680194 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.153846154 104.977214359 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9230769231 20.9669160288 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.07692307692 7.25397266985 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 6.9802955665 158% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.417158854721 0.242375264174 172% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.144824379505 0.0925447433944 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.132042707913 0.071462118173 185% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.265205001431 0.151781067708 175% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00619531707 0.0609392437508 10% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 12.6369458128 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 53.1260098522 78% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.9458128079 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.98 11.5310837438 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.5 8.32886699507 114% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 55.0591133005 158% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.